April 3, 2008 12:15 PM PDT

'98 to '08: What we lost along the way

Photo of Sony Discman CD player next to Microsoft Zune 80 MP3 player.

If nothing else, we've certainly redefined our notions of portability over the last 10 years.

(Credit: Donald Bell/CNET Networks)


In the '90s, when the MP3 was new, it was difficult to predict the medium's effect on the music industry and our culture. Today, the results of the MP3 revolution are starting to show, and I sometimes wonder what we won.

It's fitting that 2008 marks the 10-year anniversary of two of the first MP3 players, the Eiger Labs MPMan F10, and the Rio PMP300, but chances are you didn't listen to a first-gen MP3 player in 1998. With the first iPod still three years off, most of us were in the heights of our compact disc addiction 10 years ago, content to hear our music on portable CD players. Hell, some of us still listened to cassettes.

The Sony Discman pictured above belongs to me. I never use it, but I like holding on to it because it reminds me of how amazing I once thought CDs were. Sure, they would skip like crazy, get scratched, or even break, but compact discs were the first medium to usher in the idea of "permanent" music--albums that (if treated kindly) would never degrade over time. After a lifetime of warped LPs and worn-out cassettes, CDs seemed almost magical.

Today, most of us take for granted that our MP3s won't wear out or skip. In fact, there's tons of antiquated annoyances we no longer worry about in the age of the MP3. For instance, when was the last time you had to special-order your music at a record store and wait a week or more for it to arrive? When was the last time you wanted to hear an album you know you own but couldn't locate in the mess of your apartment? As the music in our lives has evaporated into noncorporeal ones and zeros, the troubled memories of acquiring and maintaining a physical music collection are quickly fading into the past.

Despite the advantages of the MP3, I'm willing to wager that somewhere in your home you have a shelf, closet, or box filled with CDs, records, or cassettes (maybe even MiniDiscs). Why do we hang on to these antiques? Is it nostalgia? Is it the fear of losing something we can't regain? Or are we just lazy?

Screen shot of Apple iTunes music software.

Programs such as iTunes perfectly sort my digital music collection, but also homogenize artists into a spreadsheet of flat, impersonal squares. As a music lover, I can't decide whether technology has improved my relationship with music or simply sanitized it.

Call it the MP3-era hangover, but even as online music providers are finally offering the DRM-free downloads we asked for years ago, I'm starting to realize that my fascination with the MP3 is starting to wane. As a music fan, I can't completely accept that MP3s are the end of the line. I won't be reviving my old Discman anytime soon, but I can't help but wonder if we've lost more than we realize in the process of virtualizing our music collections.

I want to hear what you guys think, but to start you off, here's my list of music listening habits I had in 1998 that for reasons directly or indirectly related to the advent of the MP3, have died off. Admittedly, some of these habits are also related to the difference between being 19 and 29 (you can decide which are which).

Borrowing music

I know this may sound weird considering all the P2P music "sharing" going on these days, not to mention music-focused social networks such as Last.fm, but I miss borrowing CDs from friends. Like lending out a good book, lending music used to mean the lender actually gave up something, and that sacrifice imbued the music with personal meaning. Borrowing physical media also involves face-to-face interaction, oftentimes leading to great conversations. The modern age of copying, uploading, and linking to music has allowed me to discover new music at a much faster rate, but those discoveries seem much less personal.

Album artwork and liner notes

As far back as I can remember, whenever I brought home a new cassette or CD I would pop it in my stereo and immediately look over the album artwork and liner notes. Back then, I remember feeling ripped off if a group didn't include printed lyrics, but these days, I don't think twice that most of my music collection exists as a grid of basic metatags. Sure I can always jump on a band's MySpace page or Wikipedia entry if I want to know where they're from, what they're singing about, who their drummer is, or what their album cover looks like at full size, but I wish that information was still a part of the "product."

Used music

I spent more than two years of my life working in a new and used record store in Sacramento, where used CDs outsold new CDs about four to one. Used CDs not only offered our customers an inexpensive way to acquire new music, it gave people who were bored with their music a way to put money back in their pocket.

Putting aside my nostalgia for used music stores, I think we forget that MP3s are the first music format consumers cannot legally resell. Maybe I'm weird, but over the past 10 years, I've been happy to find myself on both sides of the used music economy--selling CDs to make rent, and buying great old records at garage sales. iTunes has never helped me pay the bills, and aside from illegal file sharing, there's no way to put your MP3s back into circulation after you're tired of them.

Music as furniture

I've known people with CD and record collections that take up an entire room of their home. Personally, I love going over to a friend's home and seeing what's on their shelves (books, CDs, DVDs). As our music collections disappear from our shelves and become entombed in our computers and iPods, something gets lost. Sure, it means dinner guests can no longer judge your bad taste in music, but it also means that when you want to hear Nick Drake on a on rainy Sunday afternoon, you'll need to boot up Windows Media Player or scroll through your iPod. Personally, I miss having Nick Drake live on my shelf as a tangible part of my life, and I miss seeing friend's music collections laid bare for me to analyze and admire.

So how about you? What do you miss about how you experienced music 10 years ago? Has today's technology made you feel more or less connected to the bands and musicians behind the music you hear today? Has the shuffle feature on your iPod opened you to new music, or just erased your attention span? I really want to know, so sound off in the comments.

Recent posts from MP3 Insider
'98 to '08: What we lost along the way
Tonium launches Pacemaker online community
Subscription music's future, Part 2
Subscription music's future, Part 1
Which XNA game do you want for Zune?
Add a Comment (Log in or register) 318 comments (Page 1 of 29)
by rkinne01 April 3, 2008 12:59 PM PDT
What do I miss from the age of CD's? The ability to trade my music without the worry of RIAA dragging me to court. What I don't miss is that no wonder how well you treated the CD a smudge or scratch always ended up on the surface (now I worry about smudges and scratches on the MP3)! I still buy quite a few Cd's due to the fact that most MP3 sites (Rhapsody, I-Tunes) don't give you the choice of which quality of audio you'll get.
Reply to this comment
by rangel28 April 3, 2008 3:52 PM PDT
I find that I still buy CDs once in a while, especially if extra discs or bonus content is included. I have more than 450 CDs and all of my CDs are ripped and on my MP3 players. I love the portability of MP3 players, and the fact that I can carry my entire CD collection on my Cowon X 5. That being said, I still like the feel of a CD. I am 46, so that may explain why I like CDs; I still enjoy the feeling of opening a CD for the first time (usually after I've struggled with it a bit!) and reading the liner notes.
Reply to this comment
by crimsonfenix April 3, 2008 4:58 PM PDT
To better understand why I hang onto my CD's, let me start by saying a couple of things I won't stand for in my media are censorship and aspect-ratio reduction. In short, I hate feeling like I've been short changed when I buy and watch or listen to something with the expectation of it being a fair representation of the original. There is no way, at least in my opinion, that a track sampled at 192Kb or even 256Kb AAC or MP3 or WMA is a fair representation of a studio recording. When I'm at home, and I'm listening to music, I want to be able to hear what the composer, artist, song writer, or even the producer intended for the piece to be. That being said, a large portion of my library is in digital format, but as of late I have been using Flac more and more for archiving my discs and auto-converting that to MP3 or WMA when I want anything on my MP3 player (a Creative Zen if you're curious). Don't get me wrong, I would gladly give up on the CD trade if digital downloads become comparable in quality. That would mean an open, lossless format like Flac, Monkey, or WavePack. Being open is another important part of that; right now, I can buy a CD and play it or do with it what I will, rather that be play it in a home stereo, in a portable, in a PC, in a DVD player, etc. DRM free is a step in the right direction, but lossless AAC and WMA are both steps in the opposite; organic DRM if you will. For now, I view the current market place in much the same way others say the BlueRay HD-DVD conflict; there is no true "win" for the consumer and I am happy to stand on the side lines waiting for the dust to settle. I just hope there is something worth flocking to when it's all said and done.
Reply to this comment View all 6 replies
by ktreb April 3, 2008 7:56 PM PDT
Ten years later, I spend a lot less on music. Back in the "old" days, I would buy a cd for maybe those 2 or 3 songs that I really want. If I'm really lucky, I'll end up liking half of it. Rarely will I like all of it. And I would spend $500 - $700 a year. At most, I now spend $200 a year on downloads. This time every song is a wanted song. I still buy cds on occasion. I do have favorite artists that I've followed over the years that continue to make good/great albums.
Reply to this comment
by discsfordogs April 4, 2008 8:08 AM PDT
If you want to get rid of your old CDs and help the SPCA at the same time, check out www.DiscsForDogs.org
Reply to this comment View all 2 replies
by captainpolaroid April 5, 2008 4:54 AM PDT
I still buy CDs (and records in fact) on a regular basis. I have only ever purchased a couple of mp3s and it felt largely unsatisfying, like I'd just bought nothing. I do listen to mp3s every day, in fact while reading this article I was listening to an album (one I ripped from a CD I own of course!) on a portable mp3 player, but only out of convenience. Like you, I miss the sleeves and liner notes, all the feelings associated with holding a physical album, browsing through second record stores hoping I'll find something I've been on the look out for and something I hadn't thought about until I read your article, the sacrifice you make when you lend a CD to another person. I thoroughly enjoyed reading your piece, thanks for writing it.
Reply to this comment
by RickBee April 8, 2008 5:16 AM PDT
Due I'm sure in large part to my baby boomer status, I'm still a proponent of physical media. However, I look at CD's (and yes, vinyl) in a very importanat light: They are the proof of lisence for any digital media I might have in my collection. Any ripped media one has on a computer implies the owner still has posession of the original physical media, or it's piracy! The other reason I'm still purchasing and holding on to my discs is BACKUP. You never know when the 'ol hard drive is going to crash, takkng with it your entire collection. This is the modern equivalent of leaving your records near a heater and having them all warp :) Used CD:s and records are also a great way to inexpensivly add to the collection. I love going to the music shop and looking through the .99 vinyl and finding an obscure jazz record from the '60's. It's like a treasure hunt!
Reply to this comment View reply
by bhartman35 April 8, 2008 7:14 AM PDT
I still treasure CDs. It's not that I like the physical format (which I don't). But the big advantage to a physical CD is the sound quality. Most of the music stores provide music at 192kps, or 256kps, at best. That's just not good enough for some music. If it's music I really want to hear well, I always buy the CD. I then rip it at 320kps. While you still lose something in the ripping, at least you lose less. And if you want, you can still rip to WAV format, which of course misses nothing. The other thing CDs are good for is getting cheap music. Used CDs are alive and well at sites like Amazon. You can literally get 3 used CDs for the price of one new one. Most of the time I've done that, the only thing I lost was the shrinkwrap (although occasionally you'll get a crack in the jewel case). I think that there will be a market for CDs for as long as online music stores refuse to sell quality digital recordings.
Reply to this comment
by julzcompufreak April 8, 2008 7:31 AM PDT
I'm only 16 and I still buy CDs. Sure, I have a huge collection of songs of which I also download, but I still like the idea of buying a CD. The thing about *buying* mp3s is that you don't physically get it in your hot little hands, it feels as if you don't own it at all. I like the idea that I bought something worthwhile and good to listen to with my hard earned cash, something with a bit of weight to it, and you get the REAL album artwork as well! You also have to remember that you can't accidentally delete, reformat or lose your physical CDs due to ignorance or hard disk failure, unlike that of MP3s. My only ever gripe with CDs is the fact they get scratched, but I suppose thats the way of everything in life.
Reply to this comment
by MMBURG April 8, 2008 7:56 AM PDT
I think among the things missed is the notion of music as art form - whether in the context of "album cover art" or in the context of high quality sound. Indeed, the development of the digital format was a first step down this slippery slope, as the CD, no matter what the sampling rate, cannot compete on high end audiophile equipment with LP, the latter having a sweeter and better rounded sound. Moving from the CD to MP# - again, regardless of sampling rate - compounds the problem. Of course, we no longer sit and listen to music, whether alone or in a social group; rather, music serves as background as we walk from place to place, transport ourselves in some conveyance, or conduct our work. We have lost much in the interest of convenience, and most do not even recognize (or care?) about what has been lost.
Reply to this comment View all 3 replies
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | Next 10 Comments >>
Powered by Jive Software
advertisement
  • About MP3 Insider

  • Donald Bell, CNET's MP3 expert, hacks and spins his way to digital music enlightenment.

Add this feed to your online news reader
Google
Yahoo
MSN
On TV.com: MILEY CYRUS photographs
Visit other CNET Networks sites: