ie8 fix

Chrome (beta)

Average User Rating

3.5 stars 138 user reviews
My rating: 0 stars

you have not rated this yet

  • Rating Breakdown:
  • 5 star:
    62/138
    62
  • 4 star:
    31/138
    31
  • 3 star:
    13/138
    13
  • 2 star:
    12/138
    12
  • 1 star:
    20/138
    20
Results 1 of 138
  • "Google should have upgraded Firefox instead."
    3.0 stars
    on by egc52556

    Pros: The process & memory improvements are good and much needed.

    Cons: Adds another browser product to the market already over-saturated with options.
    Bookmark management needs improvement.

    Summary: The process & memory improvements are much needed and all browsers should incorporate some of these ideas. (Some already have.)

    Since Google is working so closely with Mozilla they could and should have integrated their improvements into an existing browser instead of making yet another brand. As a web developer I'm already sick to death of making my sites "work" with the various browsers. Chrome is just one more damned thing to deal with, and all because Google couldn't get past the "not invented here" syndrome.

  • 3 replies to this review
  • reply on September 3, 2009 by trinreqx2

    are you kidding me, more browsers=more choices, and theres not much browsers, i mean ie, fire fox, safari, opera, and chrome, and well, that is good, cause you can pick one, that safe, or eay to use, or fast, and chrome may not be the safest browser out there, and it takes a bit of time to get used to it, but chrome is the fastest browser out there, so google+ff3=X google+chrome= everybody :D.so gooogle was right in not usin ff anymore, and dropping linux to make chronium or w.e. they are gonna call their os

  • reply on March 25, 2009 by Petrus45

    I agree that if Google would have pooled resources with Mozilla they could have created an even better browser than FF3.



    Since Chrome is based on webkit (same as Safari) the rendering of Chrome should not be any different than Safari so it should not add any more complexity for web developers. (Hopefully)

  • reply on December 26, 2008 by m0nsoon

    Having more browsers is good for the end user--more options for more platforms. The addition of Chrome (and therefore Google) into the market creates a competitive incentive for developers to improve their products.

    I understand your frustration with more standards and additional checkboxes you have to fill as a developer. But I think that the overall benefit is worth the headaches which you have to undergo.

Write a Review

Quickly sign in with: or Log in or create an account to post a review.
Submit

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our site terms of use.

Back to CNET's review of the Chrome (beta)

Where to Buy

Download for free from CNET Download.com.

Set price alert

ie8 fix
Click Here

Quick Specifications

  • Release date09/2/08
  • Category Internet
  • Platform PC
ie8 fix
ie8 fix