Cheap phones

Kent German Kent German
Senior editor February 22, 2010 (updated on: July 13, 2011)

Though no one loves cell phone contracts, signing one can knock a lot of money off the price of your phone. And sometimes these service rebates can even be enough to make a handset free. In the below list, CNET has picked a few handsets that, as of this writing, either cost you one penny or nothing at all. Some require additional online-only discounts, and some offers are available only through third-party retailers. Also, keep in mind that free models tend to be on the basic side. But even with those caveats, there are plenty of satisfying phones that won't put a big dent in your wallet.

The Samsung Trender is a messaging phone for Sprint. It doesn't have the best camera, but it fits the bill as a user-friendly and functional handset centered on communication. It costs just 1 cent from Amazon.com, and because it's not a smartphone, you won't need a data plan. The Samsung Replenish packages Android 2.2 Froyo in an eco-friendly design. Call quality wasn't exceptional, though we liked the camera and the physical controls. Sprint now offers it for free.

AT&T has the Pantech Crossover. It's a well-built entry-level handset with a physical keyboard. Amazon lists it for just a penny with a contract. If you don't need quite as many features, T-Mobile has the Samsung SGH-T259. Its flip phone design is easy to use, you can get e-mail, and call quality is great. Sure, it's pretty simple, but Amazon lists it for just 1 cent with service.

Product name
Price $0.00 to $0.01 $0.00 $0.00 to $0.01 $0.00 to $184.98
CNET editors' rating
Average user rating 0 stars
Release date June 06, 2011 May 08, 2011
The Bottom Line If you're trying to avoid a data plan, the Samsung Trender is an affordable messaging option, though one of Sprint's budget Android phones could prove a better value. With a price tag of just $50, the Samsung Replenish offers good value as a basic, easy-to-use Android phone, and one that's environmentally conscious to boot. The Pantech Crossover is a well-built entry-level Android smartphone for AT&T customers who want a physical keyboard. The Samsung T259's intuitive design, excellent call quality, and affordable price make it a good choice for someone in search of a simple handset.
Similar Products Compare more products Compare more products Compare more products Compare more products
Features
Specific absorption rate (SAR)1.02 W/Kg
0.3 W/Kg
Info unavailable0.36 W/Kg
Cellular technologyCDMA2000 1X
CDMA2000 1X
WCDMA (UMTS) / GSM
CDMA2000 1X
Weight4 oz
4.1 oz
5.15 oz
3.25 oz
Talk timeUp to 300 min
Up to 324 min
Up to 300 min
Up to 270 min
Wireless InterfaceBluetooth
IEEE 802.11
Bluetooth 2.1 EDR
IEEE 802.11
Bluetooth 2.1 EDR
Bluetooth 2.1 EDR
Service ProviderSprint Nextel
Sprint Nextel
AT&T
T-Mobile
Full specifications Full specifications Full specifications Full specifications Full specifications
Buying choices

13 comments

Join the conversation!Add your comment (Log in or register)
Umh, here is a good deal, samsung intercept for virgin mobile is $250, but u pay $25 per month for 300min/unlimited text/unlimited data. That's the absolute cheapest android plan you are ever going to find.
Posted by whoisyasin (13 comments )
Reply Link Flag
The Intercept is the slowest biggest pile of crap phone to ever exist, I have it and I hate it, I have it with sprint.
It sucks.
Don't waste your money on it.
Posted by umby245 (16 comments )
Link Flag
Picked up my HTC Aria at Walmart for $.01, and love it. Great, slim Android phone (2.1) at a great price.
Posted by DaddyX5 (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
Gee, it sure would be nice if you included some Canadian data, these little summaries are pretty much a waste of time to us.
Posted by rexferal (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
I have to strongly agree with you, as I am from Canada, but CNET is a US site and is based in the US, so why would they bother?
Posted by casey_the_computer_geek (76 comments )
Link Flag
Why is it, that every article I have seen lately about cheap or affordable cell phones seem to ignore Virgin Mobile? We have had Virgin Mobile phones for years and found them just right for our somewhat limited use. This summer we switched all 4 of our familie's phones to the Virgin Mobile, LG Rumor Touch, with an unlimited Internet and texting plan, for only $25 per phone. The only minor draw backs are the 300 minute limit on talk time, the phones cost over $100 each and you can't connect your internet to a laptop. Still, this is a family of 4, each with a phone, for $100 per month. The service is through the Sprint Network and has been very good. What's wrong with that?
Posted by PEnfield (2 comments )
Reply Link Flag
Virgin = best deal out there.
I contemplated going to a "post-paid" carrier (Sprint, T-moblie, ATT) but comparing a $75+ monthly price tag with those carriers to $25 is no contest. Only time it makes any sense is when you are out of metropolitan areas not covered by Virgin. Then you have to pay the piper.
Posted by jvtrain (38 comments )
Link Flag
YOU CALL THEM CHEAP MAYBE YOU MEAN CHEAP SOME OTHER WAY THAN MONEY
Posted by joghdh (3 comments )
Reply Link Flag
My thoughts exactly.
Posted by WDRacing (1 comment )
Link Flag
What about Rogers? How come I don't see anything relevant to their products?
Posted by AlleyCritters (1 comment )
Reply Link Flag
AT&T, SPRINT, T-MOBILE, and VERIZON are ridiculously expensive.
Posted by khaino (14 comments )
Reply Link Flag
I agree with most commenters - this is really, really a dumb article. Making a decision based on the (subsidized) cost of the phone is misguided at best. None of these phones are cheap when you account for the total cost of ownership. In return for a major carrier like VZW, AT&T, T-Mobile or Sprint cutting $100-200 off the price of the phone, you will pay hundreds or thousands of dollars extra in higher service costs over the 24-month contract period. This is like choosing a printer based only on the price of the printer and not the ink, or buying a car without considering the maintenance, gas mileage, financing costs and other factors.

For people who aren't thoughtful about the financial implications of their decisions, this article will help them make poor decisions. I like CNET a lot and read it regularly, but this article is actually potentially harmful (in a financial sense) to CNET's readers.
Posted by fkaJames (19 comments )
Reply Link Flag
I totally agree. CNet was thoughtless in ignoring the actual cost of the required contract. I finally finished my two years with VZ, feeling stupid that I hadn't thought of the actual cost of the contract.
Snuss
Posted by sspies (1 comment )
Link Flag
 

Join the conversation

Add your comment

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our Terms of Use.