Pros Access to all of Nintendo's classics. Free hand controller that detects position in space. Affordable. Nintendo's online service is free. New/fun gameplay.
Cons Does not output HD video.
Summary This has got to be the best Nintendo console since the Nintendo 64 and NES. It will unveil to the world a new way of playing games and at such an affordable price of under $300. Online is all supported and its quite, small, and sleek.
No one can go wrong purchasing a Nintendo Revolution (code name) late 2006.
Pros great gameplay(i trust nintendo)
Cons doesnt match up with ps3's tech specs
Summary Nintendo is going to milk its franchises and thats a good thing.i absolutely love mario and zelda.whats more it even has backward compatibility.
Pros Sleek, sexy look
Cons unknown specs
Summary All I can say is that Revolution will live up to its name and it will change the gaming industry. While Sony and Microsoft are spending thousands of dollars just to upgrade machinery and technology for gaming, Nintendo is spending their money for change. We need a game reformation; a total recall. And Nintendo is here to do it. With Revolution's sexy look, it already gives fans confidence that it will use the top of the line quality materials for hardware and software. Next gen is a guaranteed win for Nintendo!
"SIMPLY INCREDIBLE"on by petew432
Pros Can play ever single Nintendo game EVER!!!!
Cons not as graphically powerful as XBOX and PS2
Summary Where can you legally have access to all Nintendo games ever created? Nowhere, except for the Revolution. If a Metroid game doesn't come at the system's launch, who cares? You could just play Super Metroid while you wait. If a new Mario Kart game doesn't come at the system's launch, who cares? You can just play Mario Kart 64. THIS IS TRULY AN INCREDIBLE SYSTEM!
Pros Wireless Online, Downloadable Classics, A new form of cube mapping, Revolutionary controller
Cons uh.....um.........mmmmmmm..... .*walks away*
Summary The revolution WILL be awesome. Now everyone is talking about how the revolution will be weak compared to the others but here are their claims;
-"It's so cheap, it can't be as powerful as the Ps3 or Xbox"
-"USA Today said that it is only 2 or 3 times as powerful as the gamecube"
-Nintendo had sucky graphics on the gamecube and it will have sucky graphics on the Revolution"
Here are my corrections:
+The rason the revolution is so cheap is because Nintendo realises taht they are making a gaming console so don't put it web browsing, dvd burning, music storing, bread toasting and god-knows-what else the other companies are cramming into their systems. For all we know the revolution could have BETTER graphics than the competitors.
+That was claimed false by Nintendo
+First of all, the GameCube has better graphics than he PS2 and better hardware in general in comparison to all the current generation systems. And along with a powerful chip the Revolution will have a newly patented form of cube mapping that can put in photo accurate backgrounds into the games and guess what; taht lowers the devellopment cost and produces awesome graphics.
Now, are you forgetting the analog stick, D-pad and rumble? They said that the Revolution's controller will beno different. Think of it? Microsoft and Sony put so much money into their systems and plan for success until 2010 and then suddenly they see Nintendo's new controller that will enhance gaming forever and the entire generation they are kicking themselves that they didn't think of it early.