- Average user rating: 3.5 stars out of 4 reviews Back to product review
- My rating: 0 stars Write review
User reviews
-
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful
4.0 stars
Pros: Head turner, comfortable cruiser, good road milage
Cons: ergonomic mismatches
Summary: I believe that I can address this car as I have now owned one for 9 months and have more than 16000 miles. It's a fun drive, but as noted it's not a barnburner. Highway milage is near 30 mpg at true highway speeds, closer to 22 in town. The car is ... read more >>
-
4.0 stars
Pros: hard top convertible
Cons: somewhat bumpy ride with 18 inch tires
Summary: This is the car I have been waiting for! I bought a new 2006 in the middle of 2007 and got a great deal. There is one thing that happened to the car that I have never seen before. The leather, which is a chalk color, in the back seats is turning ... read more >>
-
0 out of 2 people found this review helpful
3.5 stars
"Only CNet would rate this car higher than the Eos."
Pros: Nice exterior styling. Safety.
Cons: Ergonomics? Price.
Summary: I can't think of one thing this car does better than the Eos. Build quality? Nope. More sophisticated hard top? Nope (VW managed to put a glass sunroof in their car for the cold days when you'd still like to see the sun). Interior quality? Nope. V... read more >>
-
0 out of 3 people found this review helpful
2.5 stars
"By the way, Ford also owns Volvo now."
Pros: Ford owns Volvo which is a plus for Ford fans.
Cons: Ford owns Volvo which is a minus for GM fans.
Summary: Ford and GM own a large proportion of the "foreign" car market. I think GM bought Saab first, then Ford bought Volvo. Volvo products are not that overpriced, but they are still more expensive than a comparable Ford product. Once cheaper cars catc... read more >>
