ViewSonic P 95f+

CNET editors' review

• CNET editors' rating: 3.5 stars Very good
  Detailed editors' rating
  Overall score: 7.0 (3.5 stars)

• Reviewed on: 07/30/2002

The boxy, beige ViewSonic P95f+ 19-inch monitor has more right angles than a high-school geometry class. And like most aperture-grille tubes, it is heavier than the average shadow-mask tubes, weighing in at 55 pounds. However, what you concede in girth, you gain in other areas such as a straight-edged, 18-inch viewable area; ample onscreen controls for fine-tuning the image; and the ability to display text and graphics at high resolutions and comfortable refresh rates. When you add it all up, the monitor's $345 price tag seems like a fairly good deal.The boxy, beige ViewSonic P95f+ 19-inch monitor has more right angles than a high-school geometry class. And like most aperture-grille tubes, it is heavier than the average shadow-mask tubes, weighing in at 55 pounds. However, what you concede in girth, you gain in other areas such as a straight-edged, 18-inch viewable area; ample onscreen controls for fine-tuning the image; and the ability to display text and graphics at high resolutions and comfortable refresh rates. When you add it all up, the monitor's $345 price tag seems like a fairly good deal.

Simple setup
As with most CRT displays, setting up the P95f+ is a no-brainer. You won't find a printed setup guide or manual, but the PDF version on the bundled CD provides setup information, including a well-illustrated section that discusses onscreen controls, their functions, and--especially handy for the uninitiated--tips on when to use them.

The onscreen display controls are fairly easy to use. The P95f+ provides ample controls, especially those for adjusting screen images, such as horizontal and vertical convergence and purity, to help spiff up fuzzy-edged text and graphics. Another plus: a standalone control called UltraBrite amps up saturation levels on photos, videos, or games, making them appear less dark. This function works well, but it doesn't allow you to highlight specific screen areas in the way that monitors such as the Samsung SyncMaster 950b do.

In the laboratory
At its native 1,280x1,024 resolution and 101Hz refresh rate, the P95f+ delivered good performance on CNET Labs' DisplayMate-based benchmark tests. In focus tests, text appeared sharper at the screen's center than at corners, in part due to its variegated pitch (.25mm center; .27mm in the corners). Using the Arial font, we found that text was legible to 5.3 points but more readable at 6.8 points. The display's maximum 2,043x1,536 resolution is high for a 19-inch monitor and showed smudgy text and fuzzy icons--a problem we couldn't correct, even after using the onscreen controls. Also, the flickering, 68Hz refresh rate at this setting could cause eyestrain for some users.

Further tests revealed excellent range, though gradations were less discernible in darker areas of the color spectrum. Hues were bright but not truly vibrant. In photo tests, a flower showed nice shades of detail, and flesh tones looked realistic. The ViewSonic's relative lack of geometric distortion gave it a performance edge over competing CRTs such as the Benq Professional P992. All in all, these color capabilities make the P95f+ ideal for Web browsing, presentations, or midlevel professional imaging work.

Support for the ViewSonic P95f+ is above par. The monitor is backed by a standard three-year warranty for parts and labor, as well as 24/7, toll-free tech support. At the company's Web site, you'll find registration forms and updated drivers. Continue reading

Compare prices for ViewSonic P 95f+

This product is currently not in stock at any of our online merchants.

Email me when this product is available

Recent user reviews

• Average user rating: 2.5 stars out of 65 reviews
• My rating: 0 stars Write review

• Showing 3 of 65 user reviews

• 4.0 stars

  "sweet color worth it's weight"

  by bpaley on April 25, 2008

• 1.5 stars

  "Never happy, now worse"

  by eagleroc on April 12, 2005

• 0.5 stars

  "It does suck!"

  on January 12, 2005

• See all 65 user reviews Write review