Adobe Acrobat 6.0 Professional user reviews

Cons crashes regularly. Can't fully uninstall, and then can't reinstall. memory hog. slow. Continually get acrodist.exe errors. enough said. on April 10, 2004  | Read full review

Cons Acrobat 6.0 is dreadfully slow: 40 minutes each for ~ 10-page Word documents containing two simple flowcharts and four bitmap images on a 800MHz 512MB Win2K box. on March 12, 2004  | Read full review

Cons Very slow to load and when generating files - compared to v5. Stick with 5 for basic acrobat functionality and upgrade only if you must have the new features on January 3, 2004  | Read full review

Cons Good luck trying to find familiar tools. Text select tools are extremely tempermental, difficult to use in selecting and modifying attributes. on July 20, 2005 by tt2toes  | Read full review

Cons Ah yes, the "bloat." I don't believe this is as much Adobe's fault as it is Microsoft's. They made their product to interface with XP, XP is a bloated OS so everyone has to buy faster processors to use it...it's a conspiracy. Also, something that has plag on January 16, 2004  | Read full review

Cons VERY UNSTABLE. I always print/output PostScript files and then run them through Distiller. Never had problems with this in earlier versions but now I consider myself very lucky if Distiller will even output a PDF. It ususally takes me between 5-10 time on September 6, 2003  | Read full review

Cons 1) The "Acrobat Assistant" still has to run in the System Tray if you are to use it flawlessly. 2) Acrobat Reader is an 8.7 MB download. It sure is a pain over a dial-up connection. The most popular format on the Internet requires almost 2hrs to downloa on September 3, 2003  | Read full review

Cons Incredibly slow! Some ACAD drawings took over 20 mins to process and print (this is on a 2.4 Ghz machine with 1 GB of RAM). Also, when files were finished the files sizes were way too large to email. Adobe said I could now "optimize" the file (separate on August 5, 2003  | Read full review