Acer Aspire AX3200-U3600A

Editors' note: This price on this system is currently $579, or $120 more than what Acer had originally told us. At that price, our opinion of this PC's overall value is less enthusiastic. Even at that price, however, its triple-core CPU remains unique.

Acer's $459 Aspire X3200 is essentially the triple-core version of the dual-core X1200 slim tower PC we reviewed a few months ago. Aside from the CPU, every component from the hard drive to the memory to the operating system is the same. And while three cores sounds better than two on paper, you actually have to make certain performance trade-offs to get that additional processing core. If you're a multitasker or you know that programs you use often will put a third core to work, the Aspire X3200 makes sense. Otherwise, the X1200 provides better straight-ahead performance and the same features for no extra cost.

Having already given the X1200 the full review treatment, we'll save time here and cover just the basics of the X300. For comparison, we'll also stack it up against the Dell Inspiron 530s, its primary in-store competition at Best Buy, where both systems are currently on sale.

This pared-down, slim tower PC is designed to fit anywhere in your home, and the HDMI video port on the back makes it a viable candidate as a living room PC, more so than the VGA-only Dell Inspiron 530s. The Aspire X3200 comes in at 10.5 inches high, 3.8 inches wide, and 14.8 inches deep; 3 inches shorter and more than an inch shallower than the Dell. As a result the Acer gives you much less upgrade room, with no free hard-drive bays, and only one free half-height graphics card slot (a modem sits in the 1x PCI Express slot).

And as much as the Aspire X3200 and the X1200 are almost identical, we can say the same about the Dell and these two models. All three offer 320GB hard drives, 4GB of 800MHz RAM, and 64-bit Windows Vista Home Premium. Where the Dell falls flat for us in its lack of compelling extras. The Aspire X3200 has an HDMI graphics port, and it also holds an eSATA port and a media card reader over the Dell's head. Those three features on the Acer system give you more flexibility in the number of other devices you can use with it. The eSATA port in particular is valuable if you want to expand the storage, considering the lack of a second hard-drive bay.

That versatility, and the lower price, give both of these Acer systems the edge over the Dell. Collectively, the Aspire systems also have better performance than that of the Inspiron. Neither is faster all-around, but combined with their features advantage, the Acer's scattered performance wins cement their overall superiority.

Cinebench
(Longer bars indicate better performance)

Rendering multiple CPUs

Rendering single CPU

Acer Aspire X3200

5,034 

1,862 

Gateway GT5692

4,934 

1,772 

HP Pavilion Slimline s3500f

4,818 

2,491 

Dell Inspiron 530s

4,451 

2,360 

Acer Aspire X1200

4,296 

2,220 

The Aspire X3200 in particular has a noticeable advantage on our multitasking and Cinebench multi CPU tests. Both of those benchmarks are designed to tax multicore CPUs in particular. Because its AMD Phenom X3 8450 has three cores, it's able to complete each test faster than the dual-core Dell or Aspire X1200 systems. You'll notice that it lags behind those models on our Photoshop and iTunes tests. Those programs are more sensitive to memory and CPU clock speed. Because dual-core CPUs tend to have higher clock speeds than triple-core chips of the same price, it makes sense that the Aspire X1200 and the Dell trade wins on those tests.