CNET editors' review
- Reviewed on: 10/31/2007
- Updated on: 10/31/2009
With the GM5632E, Gateway joins Dell, HP, Lenovo, and others in offering a mainstream desktop with a quad-core Intel processor. This $1,230 PC doesn't quite bill itself as a do-everything digital media lifestyle system, lacking fancy features like an HD optical drive, wireless networking, or an automatic backup button. Instead, it offers more hard drive space, as well as slightly better performance than those other systems. We find those advantages more compelling, which makes the Gateway GM5632E the desktop system we recommend in this price range.
The GM5632E is a fixed-configuration system you'll find on the shelf at Best Buy. It's more or less the retail equivalent of the configurable DX430 on Gateway's Web site, but despite the online version's graphics card, Wi-Fi, and other upgrades, it doesn't offer a quad-core CPU option. For our money, we'd rather start with the quad-core chip and then make any upgrades after-the-fact, making the in-store GM5632E the better pick of the two.
The top competitor to the Gateway on the store shelf will be HP's Pavilion Elite m9040n. The two are very similar, as you can see from our comparison chart:
| Gateway GM5632E | HP Pavilion Elite m9040n | |
| Price | $1,229 | $1,190 |
| CPU | 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 | 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 |
| Motherboard chipset | Intel G33 | Intel G33 |
| Memory | 3GB 1,066MHz DDR2 SDRAM | 3GB 667MHz DDR2 SDRAM |
| Graphics | 256MB Nvidia GeForce 8500 GT | 256MB Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS |
| Hard drive | (2) 500GB 7,200 rpm | (2) 320GB 7,200 rpm |
| Optical drives | 16x dual-layer DVD burner w/Labelflash | 16x dual-layer DVD burner w/LightScribe |
| Operating system | Windows Vista Home Premium | Windows Vista Home Premium |
Those are only the core specs, and don't count a handful of other features. Both Gateway and HP offer TV tuners, media card readers, and integrated receivers for the bundled IR remote control that comes in each system. Both also have at least one dedicated bay for a removable, proprietary USB hard drive that will cost you extra. HP actually has two of these bays, which earns our ire, as it smacks of upselling. The HP also has 802.11a/b/g wireless networking. Some people may want this feature, and we don't mind it, but given the choice between Wi-Fi on a desktop that will likely stay put (and won't be on display in the living room), and the Gateway's larger hard drive capacity (1TB, to 720GB on the HP), and we'd take the latter every time.
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
| Rendering Multiple CPUs | Rendering Single CPU |
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
| 1,280 x 1,024 (4x AA, 8x AF) |
We'd also take the Gateway for its better performance. Although both systems use the same 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 four core processor, the Gateway has faster memory than the HP system. The result is better performance on our Photoshop test, which, in general, is an indicator of the benefit that fast memory can have on a PC. If you need a new desktop for any kind of intense, or even occasional, photo editing, the Gateway is a better pick.
You might also notice that neither the Gateway nor the HP systems offer much in the way of 3D gaming performance. This is because of their underpowered 3D graphics cards. You might be able to get away with basic gaming at low image quality settings, but if you want to play any of the flood of new PC holiday titles, you're going to want to upgrade.
Thankfully, the GM5632E is actually fairly upgrade-friendly. Both it and the HP have a PCI Express graphics card slot (although you'll need to get rid of the current graphics card), but the Gateway has a 400-watt power supply. The HP and its 275-watt power supply likely won't be too happy with 3D card upgrade like Nvidia's new GeForce 8800 GT, in addition to the greedy power demands of the quad-core chips. Gateway also has the convenient touch of outward-facing internal hard drives. That makes them much easier to replace.
Continue readingMost helpful user reviews
-
Average user rating:
0 stars
Not yet available
Back to product review - My rating: 0 stars Write review
-
Showing 3 of 3 user reviews
-
2 out of 2 people found this helpful
-
1 out of 1 people found this helpful
-
1 out of 1 people found this helpful
- See all 3 user reviews Write review

