Aperture 1.5 (complete package)

CNET Editors' Rating

3.5 stars
    Overall score: 7.6 (3.5 stars)

Very good

Average User Rating

2 reviews

All prices Set price alert
Scroll Left Scroll Right

CNET Editors' Review

CNET Editors' Rating

3.5 stars Very good
    Overall score: 7.6 (3.5 stars)
  • Setup and interface: 9.0
  • Features: 8.0
  • Performance: 6.0
  • Service and support: 7.0
  • Reviewed by:
  • Released on:
  • Reviewed on:

The good: Excellent retouching tools in a streamlined interface; delivers great results; integrated color management.

The bad: No Windows version; relatively steep hardware requirements; limited Apple support options; restrictive file-management system; no curves view or editor.

The bottom line: This raw work-flow application isn't the Holy Grail many hoped it would be, but Apple Aperture 1.5 could make life easier for photographers who need to cull, retouch, and output large numbers of photographs quickly and efficiently.

Review: Though it might seem as if Apple spawned the raw-workflow-software category--or any other category--with a mere fiat lux from the lips of Steve Jobs, fiat fiat probably hits closer to the mark. With the launch of Aperture in early 2006, Apple bestowed its design sensibility and hefty marketing budget on an application area that pro and enthusiast photographers considered, if not boring, then at best a necessary evil standing between them and their envisioned imagery. That influx of money and exposure roused Adobe from its complacency, galvanizing the year-long development of Photoshop Lightroom, which finally shipped early this year.

For

... Expand full review
Though it might seem as if Apple spawned the raw-workflow-software category--or any other category--with a mere fiat lux from the lips of Steve Jobs, fiat fiat probably hits closer to the mark. With the launch of Aperture in early 2006, Apple bestowed its design sensibility and hefty marketing budget on an application area that pro and enthusiast photographers considered, if not boring, then at best a necessary evil standing between them and their envisioned imagery. That influx of money and exposure roused Adobe from its complacency, galvanizing the year-long development of Photoshop Lightroom, which finally shipped early this year.

For the uninitiated, raw-workflow software supplies tools for those who don't require the compositing and effects capabilities of Photoshop, delivering a more targeted, streamlined approach to photographic production tasks--specifically viewing, selecting, organizing, retouching, and outputting photos. (For an example of what that means, see the first few paragraphs of the Lightroom review, linked above.)

Aperture's file handling ranks as the most important change introduced with the 1.5 update. One of its biggest weaknesses had been the way it secreted all your images from view into an operating system package file, the type usually reserved for installation programs. Now when you import your photos from removable media, it copies them to wherever you want; it also allows you to reference files on optical discs or detached drives. And you can still create a replica of the Library, called a Vault, for backup purposes.

However, the program remains fairly restrictive about the Master--original--files. For instance, you can't rename them. When you import the files, Aperture builds its database of references and gives you powerful tools for automatically naming the Version, which is the referenced Master that you work on. When you export the images, you can use the same powerful tools to name the final file. However, Apple's philosophy, and the philosophy of many Aperture acolytes, is that you have no reason to care what the file is named or where it's located. I disagree with this for a variety of reasons, but I'll offer what I consider the most compelling: many of us don't run Aperture (or Lightroom, or Photoshop) all day. We sometimes have to close applications. Who wants to launch Aperture simply to locate and copy a file? Ironically, the touted integration with Apple's iLive '06 and iWork '06 software suites was likely necessary because of the way Aperture's file handling forces you to bypass the Finder. And personally, I'd like more flexibility in renaming files from both Aperture and Lightroom, such as the ability to automatically rename using the file's keywords.

Furthermore, this closed-system approach affects Aperture's Photoshop integration to its minor detriment. Rather than storing adjustments with the original file in an XMP sidecar, Aperture creates the history and metadata XMP file only when you export. At the very least, an Edit With... option could make it a single-step process. Version 1.5 adds an Export API plug-in architecture, however, which would allow third-party software developers to greatly strengthen the ties between Aperture and Photoshop, as well as with other apps.

Aperture does maintain one significant workflow advantage over Lightroom: a Photoshop-like Proof Preview setting, which Lightroom lacks, allows you to work in a more color-WYSIWYG environment.

More on Apple Aperture 1.5
For a full discussion of Aperture's features, click here.

Hide Review

Average User Rating

2.0 stars out of 2 user reviews

Rating Breakdown

  • 5 star: 0
  • 4 star: 1
  • 3 star: 0
  • 2 star: 0
  • 1 star: 1

My Rating

0 stars click stars to rate product

CNET Community

This product is on 1 user lists. Add to my list

Most recent user reviews

Showing 2 of 2 reviews

3.5 stars

"Pretty good product, recently improved" By reeltime

Pros: Image adjustments, publishing, printing, interface

Cons: File management system is poor

Summary: Aperture is an image organizer. It's a professional version of iPhoto. If you take a lot of pictures, it's great at keeping it all together.

The loupe is a favorite feature. It allows you to blow up portions of an image quickly to check focus.

It does simple



... Expand full review

0.5 stars

"Worse than Adobe Photoshop CS3" By Fil0403

Pros: Color management; interface; results.

Cons: Functions; Apple-only; hardware requirements; support options; file-management system; no curves view/editor.

Summary: For almost the same price you get much better Adobe Photoshop CS3.
I've seen Microsoft products with a better review and worse rating. If it would be a Microsoft product it would certainly get at least 1 less point.

Write a Review

Quickly sign in with: or Log in or create an account to post a review.
Add Your Opinion

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our site terms of use.

Where to Buy

See all prices Set price alert

Specifications

See full specs

Quick Specs

  • License qty: 1 user
  • Version: 1.5
  • License type: Complete package

Sponsored Premier Brands on CNET

Where to Buy

See all prices Set price alert