Aperture 1.5 (complete package)
Starting at: $199.00
CNET Editors' Review
CNET Editors' Rating
- Reviewed by: Lori Grunin
- Released on:
- Reviewed on:
The good: Excellent retouching tools in a streamlined interface; delivers great results; integrated color management.
The bad: No Windows version; relatively steep hardware requirements; limited Apple support options; restrictive file-management system; no curves view or editor.
The bottom line: This raw work-flow application isn't the Holy Grail many hoped it would be, but Apple Aperture 1.5 could make life easier for photographers who need to cull, retouch, and output large numbers of photographs quickly and efficiently.
For
... Expand full reviewFor the uninitiated, raw-workflow software supplies tools for those who don't require the compositing and effects capabilities of Photoshop, delivering a more targeted, streamlined approach to photographic production tasks--specifically viewing, selecting, organizing, retouching, and outputting photos. (For an example of what that means, see the first few paragraphs of the Lightroom review, linked above.)
Aperture's file handling ranks as the most important change introduced with the 1.5 update. One of its biggest weaknesses had been the way it secreted all your images from view into an operating system package file, the type usually reserved for installation programs. Now when you import your photos from removable media, it copies them to wherever you want; it also allows you to reference files on optical discs or detached drives. And you can still create a replica of the Library, called a Vault, for backup purposes.
However, the program remains fairly restrictive about the Master--original--files. For instance, you can't rename them. When you import the files, Aperture builds its database of references and gives you powerful tools for automatically naming the Version, which is the referenced Master that you work on. When you export the images, you can use the same powerful tools to name the final file. However, Apple's philosophy, and the philosophy of many Aperture acolytes, is that you have no reason to care what the file is named or where it's located. I disagree with this for a variety of reasons, but I'll offer what I consider the most compelling: many of us don't run Aperture (or Lightroom, or Photoshop) all day. We sometimes have to close applications. Who wants to launch Aperture simply to locate and copy a file? Ironically, the touted integration with Apple's iLive '06 and iWork '06 software suites was likely necessary because of the way Aperture's file handling forces you to bypass the Finder. And personally, I'd like more flexibility in renaming files from both Aperture and Lightroom, such as the ability to automatically rename using the file's keywords.
Furthermore, this closed-system approach affects Aperture's Photoshop integration to its minor detriment. Rather than storing adjustments with the original file in an XMP sidecar, Aperture creates the history and metadata XMP file only when you export. At the very least, an Edit With... option could make it a single-step process. Version 1.5 adds an Export API plug-in architecture, however, which would allow third-party software developers to greatly strengthen the ties between Aperture and Photoshop, as well as with other apps.
Aperture does maintain one significant workflow advantage over Lightroom: a Photoshop-like Proof Preview setting, which Lightroom lacks, allows you to work in a more color-WYSIWYG environment.
Hide Review
Senior Editor Lori Grunin has been covering digital imaging and all types of tech for two decades and photographing for four, but the stat she's proudest of is the approximately 5,000 photos she's taken of cats (and some dogs) for the animal rescue where she volunteers.
User Reviews
See all user reviewsRating Breakdown
Most recent user reviews
Showing 2 of 2 reviews
"Pretty good product, recently improved" By reeltime
Pros: Image adjustments, publishing, printing, interface
Cons: File management system is poor
Summary: Aperture is an image organizer. It's a professional version of iPhoto. If you take a lot of pictures, it's great at keeping it all together.
The loupe is a favorite feature. It allows you to blow up portions of an image quickly to check focus.
It does simple ... Expand full review
"Worse than Adobe Photoshop CS3" By Fil0403
Pros: Color management; interface; results.
Cons: Functions; Apple-only; hardware requirements; support options; file-management system; no curves view/editor.
Summary: For almost the same price you get much better Adobe Photoshop CS3.
I've seen Microsoft products with a better review and worse rating. If it would be a Microsoft product it would certainly get at least 1 less point.
Write a Review
Specifications
See full specsQuick Specs
- License qty: 1 user
- Version: 1.5
- License type: Complete package