-
"Excellent little camera" on by dquitt
Pros: 16:9, quality of moving parts, build quality, video quality, still image quality, size, speed, looks, menus
Cons: memory stick pro
Summary: I got my HC-90 2 days ago.
I did quite a bit of homework before purchasing the HC-90. I wanted High quality DV in a 16:9 format. I own a 42" Sony LCD HDTV and I wanted sharp, high quality performance.
Other factors for me: Solid build (exterior), and good quality parts (interior). Firewire, size, ease of use, MiniDv, and price.
Things that I got but didn't expect:
size- When the package arrived, I was surprised at the size of the box it came in. It is small. When I opened the box, I was even more surprised at the size of the camera. I was expecting something compact but this little camera is small. I own a JVC MiniDV camera and it is about twice the size and 4 times as heavy. I wanted a small camera but thought that I would have to sacrifice some functionality for size. Well, I didn't. I don't think that I would want a smaller camera or it would start becoming difficult to push the correct buttons without looking around the camera first.
Still shots- I have read some comments that this camera doesn't take quality still pictures. I didn't buy it for that but this camera takes really nice photographs and in 16:9 format so it is just like having a wide angle lens. If you email your images or make DVD slide shows, this camera can take some quality shots. I have email some of the pictures to family and I had to resize them all to make them a lot smaller in dimension and subsequently, the images became sharper and details stood out. The flash works just as well as any other still digital camera I have owned. More than adequate for emailing or sharing on the web. I will be leaving my Olympus still camera behind on family outings because the HC-90 can take its place.
Motor function- I was simply amazed at the motor and function of the motorized parts in this camera. This thing is fast. Really fast. My JVC is a 3 year old piece of clunky crap compared to the HC-90. When you are playing back a movie and want to scan forward quickly, there is no waiting around for it to change gears, it does it instantly. The push button LCD is very responsive and the camera will take commands without clunking and whining. It rewinds very quickly. It sounds solid and it performs. I am most pleased with this surprise.
Things I expected (the good)
The video quality- So far it has been awesome. As I said earlier, I own a 42" Sony Widescreen and to see the entire screen filled with video is a delight for me. The colors are rich and the details are fine enough to satisfy me. The camera seems to handle 16:9 perfectly. My wife was astonished at the quality when she first saw it. I used the camera in low light mainly. Dimly lit rooms with lamps. The steady shot works great, giving a flowing look to video when you are walking around. The colors remained bright in low lit areas and in the sun, colors are rich. I messed around with some of the features and they all look good. My wife is a point and shoot person and I taught her to push the easy mode button and she was off. No teaching her how to use it. Common sense is all you need.
Dumping DV to my MAC G4 PowerBook- I plugged it in via firewire, IMovie picked up the camera instantly and I began dumping DV as well as editing. That was all there was to it. I haven't even looked at the software that Sony sent. IMovie also recognized the 16:9 ratio and set up my project accordingly. Quick Time and the Sorenson 3 codec had to be fed the aspect ratio manually. I have to figure out pixel sizes with a calculator. I plugged in the USB cable to the camera and my MAC and the MAC mounted the volume and imported my images flawlessly. I also did the same with my WINXP PC. Just plugged in the USB cable and Voila. It showed up as a new drive in My Computer.
Build Quality - Awesome. There is NO creaking (like my JVC). The camera is ergonomically great for my hands and my wife also agrees. All of the buttons are in the right place. The touch panel LCD is wonderful for me. It is solid and I don't worry about it ripping off when opening it and when you close it, it makes a satisfying thud like it was meant to be slammed shut in a hurry. The top loading of the tapes is great. No need to lay the camera on its side or anything like that. I can change the tape while the camera is plugged in to fire wire and the power simultaneously. The camera is very light but built very, very well. I am totally pleased with the build quality. It feels like a Sony. The zoom button is light or easy to manipulate but it can either zoom slowly or very quickly. It is quite sensitive and took a little getting used to. My old JVC felt like it was going to crumble in my hand and the mechanisms seemed so fragile but this camera feels like it can be handled with less apprehension.
Things that could be an issue but not as of yet.
The pry open plastic doors for cable plug in access - To charge the battery, you have to pry open one of the plastic covers to access the inputs. I can understand that these covers protect the jacks from dirt, etc. Some have said that they may easily become detached in the future. I beg to differ. My JVC has the same type of protective covers and I have not broken them off in 3 years. I was always prying on them because I am always plugging firewire, etc in to the ports. They never broke and most likely never will. I think the hinge is that annoying plasic that never breaks no matter how much you flex it. The more you use the covers, the more plyable they becaome and easier to access. The sony covers are good quality and I doubt these will ever be an issue. It is somewhat inconvienient to charge the camera because you have to open the cover first. The stand alone chargers are not that expensive and I purchased a spare battery so it might be worth getting the charger.
Memory Stick Pro - I spent a bunch of money for a Memory stick original for my Sony Still camera and it will not work in this DV Camcorder. The little one that they sent in not adequate. Looks like I will have to buy another one soon. I wish I did not.
Lens cover - This camera has a shutter that opens when you turn the power on so that you don't have to fiddle with lens covers. I absolutely love this feature but, dirt, sand, crap can collect in that area even though the lens will be protected. There are threads there for lenses and filters. There should have been a plain glass lens there to occupy and protect that area from the elements. I will most likely get a cheap filter to screw in there and protect the fine threads.
All in all, I love this little camera and I am sure that my family will enjoy it for years to come. Between this, my 12" MAC PowerBook, my 42" Sony HDTV, and living in Hawaii, I think I have what I need for ample amounts of fun.
Hope this helps some out there.Updated
I also used the HC90 for ICHAT on my MAC laptop. The guy on the other end said he got great video from me. The chat session was between Hawaii and Ireland. -
"Ease of use surpasses lack of manual control" on by cstatchuk
Pros: Good auto modes; great low-light performance; Nice size; True 16:9.
Cons: Price is too high; still images are just average; digital image stabilization hurts resolution
Summary: I shoot 75-85% of my videos indoors. Good recordings in natural light are very important for me. I also like taking candid videos. My camcorder must be quick to startup and remain unotrusive when hanging at my side. No lens cap helps too. Auto-focus and auto-exposure are essential. I can't be fiddling with settings while my subjects wait and stare. The DCR-HC90 does the job. It meets all of my quirky requirements.
The anamorphic 16:9 mode is great. It loads flawlessly into Premier Pro where I do all my post work. Even though most of my videos are shown on 4:3 screens, 16:9 gives a wide-field view that I now prefer. I'm shooting everything in 16:9 at maximum SD resolution. Yeah!
I wish the HC90 had optical stabilization and expandable batteries. Sony's digital stabilization is good enough - but optical would improve resolution. Also the prices is too high. But then again this camera is unique in the 1CCD world so I have litle choice but to pay.
I had the Panasonic PV-GS250 and returned it to buy the HC90 (for the same price
). The 3 CCDs in the Panasonic were marginally better in sunlight (better reds and blues); but indoors the Panasonic was hopelessly outclassed (virtually black and white all the time - I expected better). Summary: 3CCDs are good - but only if you shoot outside.
Some reviewers say the Sony touch screen is an issue. I really, really like it. Here's why: I am 40 years old. My eyes are beginning to suffer up close. I can see the Sony's big backlit LCD buttons in the dark or indoors. Other camcorders - with tiny "hard buttons" - are a real challenge -for nearly blind middle age types like me. -
"Best camcorder for the price...period" on by akarol
Pros: Great video/stills, 5.1 Surround Sound ability, 16:9 Hybrid LCD, NightShot, Ergonomics, Zebra Stripes, Spot Metering, Spot Focus, and lots more...
Cons: No manual focus ring, 16MB MemoryStick, proprietary hotshoe, no mic/headphone input
Summary: Ok...first, I'd like to say that I have awarded this a 10 because I feel that the average should be higher than a 9.
Second, I would like to say that this is by far the worst review I have ever seen on CNET...and I have been a customer of CNET for quite some time.
I believe that the reviewer completely overlooked the full package that this camcorder entails. If more time was spent with this camcorder, it would definetely have received a higher score. Especially when this camcorder wasn't compared to the PC350, which scored an 8.0. This camcorder is exactly like the PC350 internally, with a different form factor, and no manual focus ring. So for a complete, and accurate review, please check out the PC350's review.
This camera surpasses the PC350 as it provides better utilization of 16:9 format, allowing 30P mode to be recorded in widescreen.
Here is a list of features compared to the PC350 posted by OscarX in another forums, which basically sums it all up:
- HC90 has a widescreen LCD
- HC90 has a dedicated button to switch recording between Wide and 4:3
- HC90 can set video output to be widescreen TV or 4:3 TV. That means you can always record in Wide (true widescreen compressed is recordedand on tape) and you can play it back as full widescreen on 16:9 TV or letterboxed on 4:3 TV through the video output.
- HC90 has automatic lens cover that closes when camera is off
- HC90 has small mirror on the LCD hinge so people can see themselves
- HC90 has no manual focus ring
- HC90 has no Title or Tape name functions
- HC90 uses thin "A" batteries and there are only 2 capacities available while PC350 uses FF bateries and there are 4 capacities including the super-large FF71
- HC90 is cheaper
- HC90 seems smaller
- HC90 has 5.1 Dolby Digital ability
TO SUM IT ALL UP: LOOK AT USER REVIEWS OVER THE CNET REVIEW (at least for this camcorder) -
"An Elegant Package" on by james4513
Pros: Ture 16:9, Video Quality, Form Factor, Thoughtful Controls, Good Stills
Cons: Requires Sony memory stick and other propriority stuff
Summary: I looked at the Panasonic GS250, Canon Optura, and the Sony HC90. I wanted to like the Panasonic enought to buy it, but the Sony was just a better package. And it had true 16:9 with a 16:9 LCD, an important factor for me.
The HC90 is just an Elegant package. After using the HC90 for a while and editing 16:9 video in Adobe Premiere Elements, I'm convinced I make the right decision. It's just the right size and feels great in hand. The controls are well laid out and easy. The video quality is great. Photo quality is very good for a camcorder. 16:9 works great. And there are enough prosumer features to satisfy me.
The only thing I don't like is having to buy and use a memory stick and other Sony propietary stuff when all my other devices use standard SD, etc. -
"An excellent choice" on by pdamico1
Pros: compact size, video quality, ease of use
Cons: Small memory stick included, still photos
Summary: I also was surprised at the CNET rating on this camera. I reviewed dozens of cameras before deciding on the HC90..others I narrowed down to were the Panasonic GS250 (3CCD), Sony DCR-PC350 and Canon Optura 60. I went with the HC90 after much research for a number of reasons, many of which are personal preference. 1) Panasonic GS250 was not as compact as I would like and 3CCD didn't seem any better than large single CCD on HC90. 2) Sony DCR-PC350. This was mainly form factor, prefer the horizontal grip vs. vetical and didn't feel it offered enough over HC90 to justify another couple hundred bucks. 3) Optura 60 - good camera, but low light on the Sony beat this out. True the nightshot gives a more monochrome image, but it isn't slow shutter and it records in total darkness.
Have had the camera a week and am thus far very impressed, although still very early in my evaluation. I will say the 3MP still images are not anywhere near what you will get with a good quality digital camera, but they are okay. My old 3MP Olympus C-3040Z (6 years old) takes much better pictures but that is also a very good image even comapred to some of my newer cameras.
This is my first Sony camcorder (replaced a JVC) and the touch screen menu can be a little annoying as others have mentioned, but here is where personal preference really played in. I am a very avid digital video and still guy, I do quite a bit of video editing on a mac to produce DVD's for personal use. The truth is that although I would like to think I would use more manual controls, I don't. In the end my choice needed to be compact to take everywhere and deliver high-quality video in standard mode (turn it on and let it work). For those requirements, this was an excellent choice.
Accessories I bought:
Larger memory stick
Longer-life battery
Travel charger for battery
Lens filter