Sony DCR-IP5
Starting at: $556.99
CNET Editors' Review
CNET Editors' Rating
- Reviewed by: Rob McGee
- Released on:
- Reviewed on:
- Updated on:
The good: Very small and portable; relatively high coolness factor.
The bad: Incompatible with most video-editing software; pricey first-generation model; some controls awkward to operate.
The bottom line: For portability in a camcorder, you can't top the IP5, but its MPEG-2 footage won't meet every videographer's needs.
This little five-way controller lets you navigate the LCD menu; we wish there were a separate Select button. |
The five-way control button close to the 2.5-inch LCD on the other side of the camera was easier to use as we navigated menus, but we found ourselves wishing for a separate Select button.
| Built-in memory on each of the tiny MicroMV cassettes stores a thumbnail index of your video clips. | Included accessories. |
The camera offers plenty of shooting features through the LCD menus, including picture effects, presets for shooting different types of scenes, 24-step exposure compensation, and manual focus. Built-in memory on each MicroMV cassette gives you a convenient way to locate previously recorded footage when the camera is in VCR mode; a still frame from the beginning of each recorded segment is displayed in an index of thumbnails.
| Small buttons require a deft touch. | MicroMV cassettes are tinier than MiniDV. |
Input/output ports. | |
Video quality matches that of midrange consumer MiniDV cameras. |
As we said, MicroMV differs from MiniDV at the level of the digital data stream itself, not just in physical dimensions. While MiniDV footage uses compression within each frame, MicroMV adds the frame-to-frame compression of MPEG-2, the same compression scheme used for DVD and digital satellite broadcasts. To the user, this translates into a theoretical drop in quality when compared to MiniDV, with the likeliest problem being motion artifacts, pixelated footage that occurs if your subject is moving too fast, if there are a lot of sudden color changes, and so forth. That said, we didn't notice any such problems; video quality was on a par with that of midrange consumer MiniDV cameras.
| Low-light shots in normal (left) and low-light (right) modes. | |
Hide Review
User Reviews
See all user reviewsRating Breakdown
Most recent user reviews
Showing 3 of 75 reviews
"Simply the great !" By VaioStyle
Pros: Light-weight and handy, good video quality,easy to use
Cons: Less manual control, weak battery, expensive media,
Summary: I bought this product after going thorough all these reviews last month. I didn't find any problem in exporting and editing the clips into PC. What I feel now is, this product got a lot of criticisms because Pinnacle studio 9.00 was late to arrive in the market. ... Expand full review
"Survived 5 wks of rugged outdoor professional use, but transporting content sucked." By Livio Bestulic
Pros: Size matters when you are in the wilds.
Cons: The content takes too much effort & time to transport to editing software.
Summary: I intended to used this camera as a second unit in 5 weeks of professional mountain filming (Austrian Alps, Moroccan Atlas Mtns, and Greece's Olympus Mtns) but its size (and lack of weight) made it a first unit very often. However, I was concerned about the final quality.
Upon ... Expand full review
Specifications
See full specsQuick Specs
- Optical sensor type: CCD
- Flash type: None
- Weight: 0.7 lbs
