-
stars
"Good but slightly over rated" on by LCDking
Pros: Very good quality pictures, perfect size and weight to hold.
Cons: Way over priced for a slight boost in megapixels. Slower then previous version fps.
Summary: I'm a professional photographer, and I own many of these cameras for different purposes. I have to laugh at the first guy on here who wrote a review that there's a huge difference between the 40D and 50D. Only if you want to waste your money for a few mega pixels that will make absolutely no difference what so ever in picture quality, unless your printing off monster poster pictures for movie theater advertising, and how many of us do that? Exactly. Quality is equal for both cameras, 40D is slightly better and faster for it's easy of use, and saving about $300 to $400. If your going to look for anything better, get a full frame DSLR, only then will you be seeing some difference. CNET is pretty accurate with there rating of this camera, 3.5 stars is about correct. I dislike people who know very little about professional cameras and voice their opinion so that others read these misleading reviews and go blow their money. Like I said good camera, but the first guy and his review is way off.
- 3 replies to this review
-
hey LCDking - what do you mean by a FULL-FRAME DSLR? Which Canon models have this? thanks
-
I think that reviews form all levels of photographer are helpful to me. i want all aspects and frames of reference. I value yours as someone that has had a wide view and experience with many camera models and makes and an ameteur take because then some of the simple things I will run into will be exposed that you may overlook.
As long as someone does not misrepresent their experience level then the review is of value. -
if your buying a 50D you must not be that much of a pro photographer... and its only .2 frames per second less i dont think thats gonna make a huge difference
Write a Review
