Nikon Coolpix S210 (blue)

CNET Editors' Rating

3.0 stars
    Overall score: 6.8 (3.0 stars)

Good

Average User Rating

4 reviews

All prices Set price alert
Nikon Coolpix S210 (blue) - OVR Nikon Coolpix S210 (blue) - BK Nikon Coolpix S210 (blue) - PALM Nikon Coolpix S210 (blue) - BAG
Play Video
Scroll Left Scroll Right
  • Nikon Coolpix S210 (blue) - Video
  • Nikon Coolpix S210 (blue) - OVR
  • Nikon Coolpix S210 (blue) - BK
  • Nikon Coolpix S210 (blue) - PALM
  • Nikon Coolpix S210 (blue) - BAG

CNET Editors' Review

CNET Editors' Rating

3.0 stars Good
    Overall score: 6.8 (3.0 stars)
  • Design: 8.0
  • Features: 7.0
  • Performance: 6.0
  • Image quality: 5.0
  • Reviewed by:
  • Released on:
  • Reviewed on:

The good: Small, sleek, and attractive; some nice features for the money.

The bad: Relatively slow; poor-to-average photo quality for its class.

The bottom line: Though it's stylish, affordable, and easy to use, the Nikon Coolpix S210 performance and photo quality aren't nearly as pretty.

Review:

With its supermodel-slim body and classy chassis--clad in jewel tones of brushed metallic blue, plum, bronze, and basic black--the Nikon Coolpix S210 will certainly make a style statement when you whip it out of whatever tiny pocket you've slipped it into. But as with its slightly more expensive and marginally slimmer-than-thou competitor, the Casio Exilim EX-S880, the performance and photo-quality trade-offs you make for high style and low price may not quite be worth it.


It's not only pretty, the design is also pretty functional. Though the buttons, zoom, and four-way-navigation-plus-OK switch are relatively flat, they're clearly

... Expand full review

With its supermodel-slim body and classy chassis--clad in jewel tones of brushed metallic blue, plum, bronze, and basic black--the Nikon Coolpix S210 will certainly make a style statement when you whip it out of whatever tiny pocket you've slipped it into. But as with its slightly more expensive and marginally slimmer-than-thou competitor, the Casio Exilim EX-S880, the performance and photo-quality trade-offs you make for high style and low price may not quite be worth it.


It's not only pretty, the design is also pretty functional. Though the buttons, zoom, and four-way-navigation-plus-OK switch are relatively flat, they're clearly labeled, fairly large, and provide good tactile feedback.


Only the shutter button feels a bit small, especially when shooting vertically--my finger kept sliding down to the narrow end.

The S210 uses the typical Nikon menu scheme, though better implemented than in the annoying Coolpix S600. A Mode button pops you into selecting among auto, Hi ISO (auto ISO up to 1600, compared with ISO 800 for normal auto ISO), Scene, Voice recording, Movie, and Setup modes. Menu calls up frequently accessed shooting options: image resolution, white balance, ISO sensitivity (Auto plus manual 64 through 2000), and color effects.

You'll also find the AF area mode options here, which include Center, Manual spot, Auto, and Face Priority, as well as the various drive-mode options: single, continuous, Best Shot Selector, Multi-shot 16 (16 successive shots in a single frame), Interval Timer, and Time-Lapse in movie-capture mode. The BSS can be quite useful--it shoots up to 10 photos as you hold the shutter down, then saves the sharpest of the bunch.

But you really don't want to shoot at higher than ISO 400 with this camera, so forget the high ISO mode. As with the S600, the face-priority AF is too slow, as well as too erratic, to take seriously, and as with most snapshot models, the auto area AF invariably picks the wrong subject. As usual, I recommend that you eschew all the fancy AF modes and instead use center AF, focus, and recompose. For selecting the appropriate subject, you're still faster than the camera. There's also D-Lighting, which can apply tonal corrections in-camera for those inevitable underexposed shots, but this feature works best on models that have better high-ISO performance; it unavoidably exacerbates noise. The camera lacks optical image stabilization, and electronic stabilizers are generally poor substitutes.

Unfortunately, the S210's performance is fairly sluggish. It wakes up and shoots in a reasonable amount of time--2 seconds--but its normal single and sequential (not burst) shooting performance trails both competitors and what we consider generally acceptable. It takes 0.9 second to focus and shoot under optimal conditions and 1.5 seconds in suboptimal circumstances; most snapshot cameras have gotten those times closer to 0.5 and 1 second, respectively. Firing two shots in a row takes 3.1 seconds, 3.4 seconds with flash, both of which are close to bottom-of-class performance. Oddly, continuous-shooting performance does OK, bursting at a rate of about 1.5 frames per second.

The LCD fares pretty well. At 2.5 inches, it's a bit small for a fashionista camera and a tiny bit smaller than the EX-S880's, but about as big as you could fit on this model and typical for the price. If you boost the brightness, it's adequately viewable in direct sunlight, though that will eat into the camera's 220 shot battery life (CIPA rating). But it's got a nice, wide viewing angle that delivers a good overhead shooting and group viewing experience.

Hide Review

Average User Rating

2.5 stars out of 4 user reviews

Rating Breakdown

  • 5 star: 2
  • 4 star: 0
  • 3 star: 0
  • 2 star: 0
  • 1 star: 2

My Rating

0 stars click stars to rate product

CNET Community

This product is on 1 user lists. Add to my list

Most recent user reviews

Showing 3 of 4 reviews

4.5 stars

"An excellent point and shoot camera!" By legitimate_kitty

Pros: -Clear, sharp, pictures
-A lot of scene modes
-Small and compact
-Bright display screen
-Long battery life

Cons: -Flash sometimes gets annoying
-The silver ring around the lens gets easily scratched
-Have to take out battery to charge

Summary: I got this camera for my birthday last year. And before I even get started on writing a review for this camera, I want to say my Nikon Coolpix S210 has inspired me to be more than your average joe photographer. Of course I wasn't bad before and I ... Expand full review

0.5 stars

"Worst camera I ever bought" By alsopalinalso

Pros: Size (which makes it easy to lose..and that's a positive!)

Cons: Extremely slow performance, hard to use controls, battery life (30 shots), blurry pictures, poor zoom quality

Summary: This camera is a complete disaster. It takes forever to start up and you cannot take conitnuous pictures. It takes about 30 seconds to shoot one image. It is just slow, slow, slow. The controls seem counter intuitive and the battery life is terrible. The images I took were terrible ... Expand full review

Where to Buy

See all prices Set price alert

Specifications

See full specs

Quick Specs

  • Digital camera type: Ultracompact
  • Product Type: Digital camera - Compact
  • Resolution: 8 megapixels

Sponsored Premier Brands on CNET

Where to Buy

See all prices Set price alert

Which digital camera is right for me?

Laptop Finder

In order to choose the right camera--one with the right set of features at the right price--you'll need to figure out what you'll be doing with it.

In this guide, we've compiled a handful of typical user profiles to help outline the specific uses for digital cameras. Match your needs to one of these user profiles to determine the digital camera that's right for you.

Read our guide | Step-by-step digital camera finder