
As with other megazoom lenses, however, the Sony's displays some distortion, chromatic aberration (edge discoloration) on the sides of the photo, as well as purple fringing on high-contrast edges. In general, the Canon PowerShot S5 IS exhibits better sharpness both in the center and from side-to-side. As for shots at medium-to-high sensitivities, I suggest you avoid them.

For movie capture, Sony makes a slightly better trade-off than most between file size and movie quality. Though they're not quite as sharp, its 30fps VGA MPEG movies require about 1.3MB/sec of storage--far less than the Canon's 2MB/sec M-JPEG recordings. One disappointment here is the tiny microphone that records muted audio.
If you shoot primarily outdoors in daytime--especially sports, children, and animals--and don't find the interface quite as crazy-making as I do, the H7 is a good choice. The approximately $100 difference in street prices between the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H7 and DSC-H9 makes your choice simple: If you can forgo the infrared and the flexible LCD, then buy the cheaper model.
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
| Typical shot-to-shot time | Time to first shot | Shutter lag (dim) | Shutter lag (typical) |
(Longer bars indicate better performance)



