-
stars
"Outstandingly good e-reader" on by Paulddb
Pros: small enough to fit in a jacket or trousers hip pocket
compact enough to take everywhere
good contrast and screen clarity
good battery life
will charge using iPhone or iPod charger (?)
pleasurable reading experience
pages numberedCons: I can find no cons.
The weaknesses mentioned in the review are minor things that no not impact the reading experience. A larger screen would hold more text, but I bought this reader because if its portability.Summary: Despite lack of fancy features, the PRS-300 is perfect for my purpose - reading books. It's easy to hold (I use the optional leather cover); it goes in a jacket pocket and even in trousers hip pocket, and I do find myself taking it everywhere to grab a few minutes reading, even in places where I might not take a printed book. It's the sheer convenience of having this reader with me that makes it outstanding.
After one week of heavy use, the battery still shows full charge. I found that the iPhone/ iPod charger does seem to charge through the USB port, but I may be mistaken.
I chose this because screen contrast and clarity are better than the touch-screen PRS-600; the larger screen has a preferable page layout, but for me contrast is more important.
The review complains of sluggish page turns - I often flick back a few pages to read a prior passage, and page turning is still as quick as with a paper book. The pages are numbered (unlike Kindle) and reformat according to font size. Even if you read several books concurrently, the Sony remembers your page in every book you've read.
- 6 replies to this review
-
How come Sony lies and say they will compete with Amazon the price of books.. It outrageous the price difference on some of the books. Just recently I tried to download "Half the Sky" $19.95 in the Sony library and $9.95 on Amazon. They lied when I bought and they lie now that they will compete with Amazon. With such high prices why would anyone want the Sony Vs the Kindle..or even the IPAD//
-
righto then, thanks for nothing, adios.
-
don't you get emails about these comments?
if so could you please just take 5min to respond -
Or if you're not a member (worthwhile forum IMO) just email me:
jedi.theone at gmail.com
All the best. -
Hi Paul,
If you want to respond to me my thread's here:
http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?p=17385034
Thanks again!
Jed -
Hi Paul,
Would you be the same person who did this review?
http://www.amazon.com/Sennheiser-RS-170-Wireless-Headphone/product-reviews/B002TLT10I/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1
If yes I'm wondering if you'd be kind enough to allow me to ask you some questions?
I would ask on the amazon site but it doesn't allow you to post responses until you've bought something!
Thank-you so much for that well considered write-up!
Just curious, it sounds as though simulated surround is not of interest to you, so why did you go for the 170?
Is it because you have a spouse and you wanted to minimise potentially annoying leakage?
Generally speaking open headphones lend themselves to better sound quality; so long as there's little ambient noise.
Have you had the opportunity to do any direct comparisons between the 170 and 180?
Were you a previous owner of the RS 130?
If so how does it compare to the 170 when you have the 130 within a 10ft radius of the transmitter?
Thanks!!

