ie8 fix

Monster Digital Daytona review (480GB)

See all models

Cost per gigabyte

Performance
I tested the 480GB-capacity model of the Daytona, and it exceeded my expectations for a somewhat entry-level solid-state drive. Note that in the world of SSDs, higher capacity can also mean better performance. Accordingly, the smaller-capacity Daytona drives might be slower, though not by much.

In data-copying tests, the new drive did very well, with 209MBps when used as a computer's secondary drive. This was in no way close to the fastest I've seen, but considering that this is not supposed to be a performance drive, it was very fast. In fact, it was faster than the 178MBps of the Le Mans, which costs more and is supposed to be a higher-tier drive.

When used as the main drive that hosted the operating system, and performed both writing and reading at the same time, the Daytona scored 108MBps, clearly slower than the Le Mans' 122MBps.

The drive indeed improved the system performance a great deal compared with a traditional hard drive. The test computer took just 12 seconds to boot up and about 8 seconds to shut down. All applications also took much less time to launch. This is typical when moving to an SSD from a traditional hard drive.

Compared with the rest of the 7mm SSDs on the market, the Daytona is about average in terms of performance.

Data-transfer scores (in megabytes per second)
(Longer bars indicate better performance)
As secondary drive  
As OS drive  
WD VelociRaptor 300GB
112.59 
47.12 
Seagate Barracuda XT
115.71 
51.1 
WD VelociRaptor 600GB
126.33 
58.05 
Sandisk Ultra
96.4 
65.6 
Patriot Pyro
190.01 
76.44 
RunCore Pro V Max
186.78 
92.55 
OCZ Agility 3
207.75 
101.67 
Monster Digital Daytona
209.04 
108.32 
Plextor M3
221.98 
110.4 
Sandisk Extreme
234.15 
117.66 
Crucial M4
235.51 
117.99 
Monster Digital Le Mans
177.56 
121.11 
OCZ Octane
183.41 
135.43 
Corsair Neutron
237.69 
138.44 
Intel 520 series
230.01 
154.01 
Plextor M5 Pro
251.19 
155.65 
RunCore Pro V 7mm
236.71 
155.89 
Corsair Neutron GTX
273.62 
161.38 
OCZ Vertex 4
246.55 
168.36 
Samsung 830 Series
261.63 
172.88 

Boot and shutdown time (in seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
Shutdown  
Boot time  
Corsair Neutron GTX
5.28 
10 
Sandisk Extreme
6 
11 
Plextor M5 Pro
6.21 
11.1 
Monster Digital Daytona
8.21 
12 
Corsair Neutron
6.2 
12 
OCZ Vertex 4
6.8 
12 
OCZ Octane
6.3 
12RunCore Pro V 7mm
6 
12 
Intel 520 series
6 
12 
Patriot Pyro
6 
12.5Monster Digital Le Mans
5.96 
13Samsung 830 Series
6 
13.3SanDisk Ultra
7.2 
13.5 
Crucial M4
6.8 
OCZ Agility 3
6.7 
14.7WD VelociRaptor 600GB
7.9 
45.4Seagate Barracuda XT
12 
48.2 
WD VelociRaptor 300GB
12.2 
56.2 

Conclusion
With good performance and relatively friendly pricing (for a solid-state drive), the Monster Digital Daytona makes a very good upgrade for those currently use a standard hard drive for their computer's main storage.

 

Member Comments

Add Your Comment

Conversation powered by Livefyre

ie8 fix

Quick Specifications

CNET editor Dong Ngo has been involved with technology since 2000, starting with testing gadgets and writing code for CNET Labs' benchmarks. He now covers networking and storage, and also writes about other topics from online security to new gadgets and how technology impacts the life of people around the world. Full Bio

ie8 fix