ie8 fix

Beats Pro High-Performance (White)

Average User Rating

2.5 stars 40 user reviews
My rating: 0 stars

you have not rated this yet

  • Rating Breakdown:
  • 5 star:
    9/40
    9
  • 4 star:
    7/40
    7
  • 3 star:
    4/40
    4
  • 2 star:
    5/40
    5
  • 1 star:
    15/40
    15
Results 1 of 40
  • "Extremely overpriced, overglorified and overhyped."
    2.5 stars
    on by crinacle

    Pros: Looks very nice, sturdy build, great for rap and pop music.

    Cons: As stated in titles, extremely overpriced, overglorified and overhyped. People love to shoot out of their ass when they own one of these, and start to call them "the best there is" when there is much better choices to choose from.

    Summary: Firstly, I have to say that I'm an audiophile. But still, it absolutely pisses me off when the stereotype finds us being the only kind of people wanting "faithful, accurate, natural tone in our headphones".

    THIS IS ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY, NOT TRUE.

    There are such things as a basshead audiophile, or a rock audiophile, or maybe even a classical audiophile. I belong to the basshead category. With this in mind, you have to understand that when it comes to headphones, we are very picky, but we definitely aren't the type to search for neutral, "natural" headphones (which I personally feel makes the music sound ABSOLUTELY BORING Zzzzzzzzz).

    First off, the build quality. Granted that it's sturdy. It feels solid, unlike the Solo, Solo HD or the Studios for that matter. I have no complaints about this.

    Next, comfort. A very subjective aspect, though I also have to qualms about this. There is ample padding in every side of the headphone, unlike my Shures which, personally, HURT LIKE A BEAR TRAP.

    Next, oh ho ho, its sound. Being an audiophile (a basshead audiophile, I RE-EMPHASISE AGAIN), I have a set list of criteria that a headphone has to go through in order to make it to my "IMMA GONNA RECOMMEND THIS TO E'ERBODY" list.

    1. Is there enough bass?
    2. Is the bass clear?
    3. Does the bass bleed and/or muddy up the middle frequency (the frequency in which the vocals, guitars, basically 90% of instruments are)?
    4. Is the sound distorted the any way?
    5. Do the headphones give an accurate reproduction of the music (again, you do not want rap to sound like blues, or classical to sound like rock do you?)? How much detail pickup is there?

    Lets start with 1.. Oh definitely. Bass is there like a lion in a crammed cage. You can't miss it even on bass-light music, and this is what I love in my headphones.

    2. Clear bass? I would say... yeaaaaamaybe. It's not as tight (or as punchy) as any of my Ultrasone models, but they do have the reverb of the Sony XB series. Pretty okay, most of the details in the bass aren't missing from the music here.

    3. Bass bleed? Surprisingly, little or nothing. The middle frequencies remained untouched by the bass. To be more in-depth with the mids and the highs, vocals sound smooth-ish while guitars sound too warm (A.K.A. veiled or lush or "slow") for my liking. If you're a metal or rock lover, STEER AWAY.

    4. Sound distortion. Apart from a little warmth in its general sound, no complaints here.

    5. Reproduction. Even though I'm a basshead, all headphones still need to be able to hear the recording AS IT IS. To avoid any arguements here, let's take a look at Dre's words towards the Beats line:

    "People aren't hearing all the music.

    Artists and producers work hard in the studio perfecting their sound. But people can't really hear it with normal headphones. Most headphones can't handle the bass, the detail, the dynamics. Bottom line, the music doesn't move you.

    With Beats, people are going to hear what the artists hear, and listen to the music the way they should: the way I do."

    So OBVIOUSLY, if you're such a Beats fanboy, you're looking for "accurate reproduction" in your headphones. Otherwise, pardon my language, WHY THE **** DID YOU BUY THESE THINGS?

    Again, you're looking for the detail within your music, every last nuance, drum vibration, guitar air or mouse fart, you're not looking hard enough if you went for these. i have to be frank; compared to other more well-respected and professionally recognised brands (NO. Beats is NOT professionally recognised. What your favourite singers wear does not decide how good the headphones are), the detail pickup is absolutely and utterly... average. Mediocre even.

    As for reproduction of the music, the ONLY genre they seem to reproduce properly is rap and pop. Other genres like classical, rock, blues, electronica even, all sound artificial under the wrath of these headphones. If you're willing to pay $400 for a rap + pop pair of headphones only, be my guest. BUT...

    I will re-emphasise again, THESE ARE OVERPRICED. I can name a hundred or so headphones that does what these do just as good and even BETTER and just a quarter of the price. I'll be wasting my time naming all these headphones, but I'll pick out 5 of my favourites:

    5. Beyerdynamic DT700 Pro 80 Ohm Edition. A good entry-level bass king, the DT770 provides boomy sub-bass that vibrates your entire skull. Again, these beat the Beats Pro by a mile in terms of overall clarity as well as bass quantity, at a cheaper price as well.

    4. Ultrasone HFI-580. Having the same amount of bass at a quarter of the Beats Pro's price, it's a killer. Even so, the quality of the bass in the HFI-580 far surpasses the Beats Pro's, being tighter, punchier and clearer than the latter. What's overpriced now?

    3. Audio Technica Pro700 MKII. A relatively new headphone in the market, the Pro700 beats, bashes and mashes the Beats Pro every every aspect you and think of. Bass? One of the best. Mids? No contest really. Highs, come on, any headphone other than Skullcandy or Bose can beat the Beats Pro.

    2. Sony XB1000. Or as I would like to call them, "GIANT FLUFFEH PILLOWS OF AWESHUM BASSSS XD"! But in all seriousness, the Sony XB series are notorious for its earthshaking, diarrhoea-inducing bass, which will put any Beats headphone to shame with a thump of a drum, literally.

    1. Ultrasone Pro900. Absolutely godly and reigns king supreme in the bass department. No other headphones can ever DREAM of trying to beat the Pro900 in terms of bass quality. If you love the Beats Pro, the Pro900 will re-educate you, no holds barred. Strap two mini-subwoofers to your head and VOILA! Pro900.

    Granted that the Beats Pro aren't terrible headphones, I would rush for them if they were priced at $100. Unfortunately, they instead cost a whopping $400, a price in which only the stupid, cliche consumers would be sucked into.
    Don't be a stupid consumer. Get better headphones.

  • 13 replies to this review
  • reply on September 7, 2012 by Sandra James

    And after one year my Dr. Dre beats stop working and Monster no longer supports this product, so you have just wasted your money, if you purchase this product.

  • reply on August 15, 2012 by CraZy-Leee

    Crinacle can you take a look at
    in headfi org .../t/622459/best-hip-hop-r-b-and-a-little-bit-of-house-headphone#post_8612914

    need some more advices and offers!

    looking forward for your support over here!

  • reply on April 12, 2012 by crinacle

    @jeff the Pro900s were at $400 at one point... very much at the same price as the Beats Pro. If you like Beats, so be it, but note that there are definitely much, much better options for the amount you're paying for. If you're interested in more reviews, go to Head-Fi; probably the most reliable site for headphone reviews.

    @Iklee Probably the Pro700 MK2. It sounds great, booms with enough bass and looks badass enough to kill.

  • reply on March 30, 2012 by lklee5571

    crinacle - you seem to really know what you're talking about so I was hoping you could give me some guidance. I'd like to buy my son a good pair of headphones for general listening of music. He listens to a variety of music (the standard stuff you'd hear on the radio, no rap or heavy metal). I was looking at the Beats but only because that's what others seem to be buying. I don't know anything about music or headphones. Could you please offer me some recommendations? Thanks.

  • reply on March 20, 2012 by jeff_b_123

    ok it is true that the "Ultrasone Pro900" are very good but they are like $500 as well! so it would be just as pointless to get a pair of headphones that are even more then the pair you are down talking. the sonys are good but they are also fairly pricey. i am getting beats in a month but have seen a hole bunch of online reviews and think that they look/sound amazing. i did have colby deep bass folding headphones and i loved them until they broke... the ear cup came off and the cord started not working. and it is not just me it happend to like 4 to 5 more people in my grade.

  • reply on December 16, 2011 by queen82169

    I am looking for a decent pair of resanobly price headphones for my 12 and 17 year olds sons who wanted Beats by Dre. I refuse to supply $300 headphones for people who don't work and know the true value of money. However, I would like something they can be realatively proud of having while some of their overpriviledged friends are rocking beats. I was thinking more like $100 or less. Any suggestions. Primarily listen to Rap and hip hop. Please email me your opinion at queen82169@gmail.com
    Thanks, Donna

  • reply on December 12, 2011 by Buttmonki

    I have to disagree with you regarding the Beyerdynamic. I wanted to buy these but went to demo them first. I already have a pair of B&W P5 and my husband has the Grado SR325is so I took them both with me for comparison. The Beyerdynamics were awful, I was so utterly disappointed, they sounded completely flat. At first I compared them to the Grado which was perhaps a little unfair as they are open ear and in a different league so then I compared them to the P5s they still sucked. Then I compared the Grados and the P5s to the Beats Studio and Pros. The Studios were terrible but I was pleasantly surprised with the Pros. My husband who enjoys to classical music and opera had a listen on them and was not overwhelmed but did not think they were a bad set of cans. I agree however they are overpriced, but I got them for £275 and I would say they are worth around £250 so I was happy with them. So think of them as a £250 headphone with an extra £100 for style.

  • reply on November 13, 2011 by scotty227

    some people just don't get fashion...

  • reply on October 29, 2011 by deadlyasaisn88

    dude thanks for taking time to share your knowledge. u saved me from burning in hell whit those beats pro. i am going to buy pro900 ultrasone or sony xb 1000. cant decide tought out of those 2 lol. do u mind giving me ur e mail adress i got another question for u thanks.

  • reply on September 3, 2011 by caliscrizle

    sorry about the misspell dont know why it put th p5's like that but should read B&W P5's

  • reply on September 3, 2011 by caliscrizle

    Just wondering if you ran these in for over 30 hrs before you made the decision that they were no good?. Im an audiophile also and I purchased the B&W P5's and the AKG-Q701's and gave the Beats Pro a try the akg's very lacking in bass after burn in, but mids and hi's are scary good the b&w's had better bass and like the akg's mids and highs were excellent, both b&w and akg had over 30hrs of burn inbefore I auditioned them and came to this conclusion, now the beats pro's out of the box were in a word HORRIBLE!! unlike the b&w's which were nice out the box a little to warm and laid back, but I gave the pro's the proper burn in, and i'll be damned if everything came together nicely, mids were nice not forward but smooth and controlled, highs were crisp not sizzly and the bass was controlled yet reached to to 10htz and kept it all tohether, I listen to mostly acoustic, jazz such as ray la montagne jack johnson miles davis etc, so dont know everybody hears different, thats just my 2 cents.

  • reply on July 7, 2011 by crinacle

    Hi ILIKEAUDIO,

    Could you give your music preferences please? Or even better, go to Head-Fi and start a new thread. I'll have a look at it, along with other audiophiles :)

  • reply on July 4, 2011 by ILIKEAUDIO

    HI, i own the Beats pro. there the best headphones in turns of audio quanity. i personally love these headphones cause first. i got these for half price at my local deal which makes these a great buy because the audio is ok(in terms of it being compared to akg k701, sennheiser hd595) and the build quanity is by far the best. these things are tanks, i love them. being able to not have to send in headphones for repairs are a blast. i also have a question for you. do you know when the mdrxb1000 come out. I've been waiting for like ever. and do you know anything in terms of price. my last question is do you own the pro900 cause im also looking for a hifi headphone. and i was wondering if you could give more detail on that, im thinking hd650, akg k701 or hd595.

Write a Review

Quickly sign in with: or Log in or create an account to post a review.
Submit

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Click here to review our site terms of use.

Online Stores

Store
Promotions
In Stock
Price
Total Cost
Initial Sort Order
Crutchfield 60-Day Money-Back Guarantee. Lifetime Tech Support. Yes

$399.95

Ship: TBD

Tax: TBD

$399.95
Adorama Ships same day if ordered by 8:00pm EST Yes

$249.95

Ship: TBD

Tax: TBD

$249.95
Cascio Interstate Music No

$299.95

Ship: TBD

Tax: TBD

$299.95
See all prices
Back to CNET's review of the Beats Pro High-Performance (White)
ie8 fix

Quick Specifications

  • Release date09/29/10
  • Headphones Type Headphones - Binaural
  • Product type Headphones
  • Design Ear-cup
  • Color White
  • Sound output mode Stereo
  • Connector type Mini-phone stereo 3.5 mm
  • Service & Support Details Limited warranty - 1 year
ie8 fix
ie8 fix