Reviewed by:
Justin Jaffe
Edited by:
Matthew Elliott
Reviewed on 3/3/06
Updated on: 4/12/06
Release date: 2/15/06
Apple's first new laptop since
the company switched to Intel processors, the 15.4-inch MacBook Pro features a
Centrino Core Duo processor and, in doing so, ushers in a new era of Apple computing. Replacing the
15-inch PowerBook in
the company's lineup, the MacBook Pro delivers many familiar, beloved features, along with a few new ones. While the Intel partnership gives Apple the potential to match the performance capabilities of its Windows-based competition, the first MacBook Pro, like the
iMac Core Duo, shows signs of the growing pains Apple faces in switching to the new platform. We expect the company to work out these kinks as it transitions the remainder of its laptops to Intel, but for now, beware: If you use Photoshop or other apps that are not native to the Mac OS, you will see diminished performance, forced as they are to run through Apple's stopgap Rosetta translation utility (more on this below). On the plus side, Apple recently released another utility, called
Boot Camp, which lets you run Microsoft Windows XP on the MacBook Pro (and other Macs with Intel processors). So, if you have a PC version of Photoshop or another nonnative application, you can now install and run it (with no performance impediments) on a MacBook Pro running Windows XP. If all of that sounds like too much trouble, the
HP Pavilion dv1000t and the
Acer TravelMate 8200 offer superior performance (compared to nonnative applications running on the Mac OS) and many of the same features for a lower or equal price.
With the MacBook Pro, Apple hasn't radically redesigned the PowerBook form factor--it has just made a few refinements to it. As such, the sleek, aluminum MacBook Pro looks
very similar to the 15-inch PowerBook G4--just a tad wider, to accommodate the slightly larger 15.4-inch (diagonal) display, and a few millimeters thinner. Striking a successful compromise between portability and usability, the MacBook Pro weighs 5.5 pounds--an ounce less than the PowerBook and toward the upper end of the
thin-and-light category. The MacBook's AC adapter, which is larger and 3 ounces heavier than the PowerBook's, brings the total package to 6.2 pounds. One awesome innovation: the
MacBook's AC adapter connects magnetically to the laptop, so if you accidentally trip over the cord, it will simply detach instead of sending your MacBook flying or tearing out the laptop's innards.
Underneath the lid, the MacBook Pro extends the tradition of the PowerBook's minimalist design. The MacBook Pro has just a power button; a big, keyboard framed by stereo speakers; a very large touch pad with a single mouse button; and one new feature: a handy built-in iSight camera that sits above the display. Though the keys are a bit shallow, they're wide, and we found them comfortable to type on; we also love the keyboard's backlighting feature, which adjusts to changes in ambient light levels. The touch pad lets you scroll through long documents, Web pages, and spreadsheets by dragging two fingers down or across the pad, a terrific feature that's unique to Apple laptops. The MacBook Pro's 15.4-inch (diagonal) wide-screen display features a fine 1,440x900
native resolution and looks noticeably brighter than the 15-inch PowerBook's display and about as bright as the average PC laptop display.
Apple updates some of the PowerBook's ports and connections with the MacBook Pro and scales back a few others; overall, we think the MacBook Pro comes up a bit short of what you'll find on similarly priced PC laptops, such as the TravelMate 8200 and the Pavilion dv1000t. That said, the MacBook Pro features two USB 2.0 ports (fewer than most comparably sized PC laptops); a FireWire 400 port; an
ExpressCard slot; and DVI and VGA ports for connecting to an external monitor. It's also equipped with
Bluetooth 2.0+EDR (enhanced data rate), and you can access the Internet via 802.11g Wi-Fi radio and Gigabit Ethernet. As with the PowerBook, the MacBook Pro features a slot-loading SuperDrive that plays and burns DVDs and CDs. One new extra is a small remote control, which looks like an
iPod Shuffle, that controls the included Front Row multimedia player; we wish the MacBook had a storage slot for it (like the Pavilion dv1000t has for its remote). Unlike most PC laptops, however, the MacBook Pro lacks a built-in media reader for flash memory cards; also, there's no S-Video output, composite-video connection, FireWire 800 port, or built-in modem--all of which the PowerBook had.
The MacBook Pro ships with
Mac OS X Tiger, highlights of which include the incredibly cool Spotlight search utility and the customizable Dashboard, a collection of handy desktop tools. Also included is the robust
iLife '06 software suite and a handful of other apps; an equivalent batch of PC software could easily run hundreds of dollars.
The MacBook Pro comes in two standard configurations, each running Intel's new Core Duo processor: a 1.83GHz model for $1,999, and a 2.0GHz model for $2,499 (which you can upgrade to 2.16GHz for $300 more). We tested the base 1.83GHz version, which was equipped with 512MB of 667MHz DDR2 RAM; an ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 graphics card with 128MB of VRAM; and an 80GB 5,400rpm hard drive. In testing the MacBook Pro, we compared it against a number of older Apple laptops running the PowerPC processor, as well as a group of Windows-based laptops running Intel's Core Duo processor. As with the iMac Core Duo, which we tested in January, the results were mixed.
Apple has prepared its own software, such as iLife, to run with the new Intel processor and has developed a translation program called Rosetta to help the Intel Macs run older applications for the Mac. Not every software vendor has completed the necessary reprogramming to ensure full performance on the Intel Macs, however, so some applications, Photoshop and Sorenson Squeeze among them, run significantly slower--slower than on even the lowest-end iBook. But Rosetta is required only when running the Mac OS; with
Boot Camp, you can turn the MacBook Pro (and the other Intel-based Macs) into a dual-boot machine that runs full versions of
Mac OS X and Windows XP.
After Boot Camp was released, we pitted a MacBook Pro running Windows XP against a MacBook Pro running Mac OS X, as well as the PC competition. We found that nonnative apps such as Photoshop run much faster in the Windows environment. We expect this performance delta to shrink or disappear altogether once more universal binary apps--nonnative Mac software built for the Intel platform--are released. Still, the transition is far from complete. Though Apple can boast of the hundreds of apps that do run natively on Intel-based Macs, Adobe's universal binary version of its next Creative Suite (which includes Photoshop) is likely more than a year away. Do note, however, that if you are currently frustrated by Photoshop performance on a MacBook Pro, you'll need to purchase the Windows version in order to do an end run around Rosetta and operate within Windows. You'll also need to pick up a copy of
XP Home or
Pro. You can read more about how our
Windows XP-enabled MacBook Pro performed here.
That said, the MacBook Pro runs native applications such as iTunes considerably faster than previous Apple laptops, and working within the OS just
feels faster. We also found that applications that have been
patched for Apple-Intel machines, such as Unreal Tournament 2004, show serious speed gains; in UT2004, the MacBook turned in about twice as many frames per second as the
17-inch PowerBook G4, making it the first Apple laptop possibly worth gaming on. (Our testing of a MacBook Pro running Windows XP reinforced this finding.)
It's only a matter of time until the software catches up, and
most major vendors have committed to the transition. We do recommend looking into your favorite apps--especially if you use them for work--to see how the compatibility is shaping up before making a purchase. CNET's
iMac Core Duo review contains many more details about Rosetta, universal binary, and other issues related to application performance on the new Intel-powered Macs.
For such a portable laptop, it's a shame that the MacBook Pro's battery life comes up short. In our DVD battery-drain test, the MacBook Pro lasted for 2.9 hours--a bit more than the 15-inch PowerBook we tested last summer, but still inferior to the PC competition. The TravelMate 8200 lasted for almost 3.5 hours and the Pavilion dv1000t just shy of 4 hours.
Apple backs the MacBook Pro with an industry-standard one-year warranty that covers parts and labor, but toll-free telephone support is limited to a mere 90 days--well short of what you'll typically find on the PC side--unless you purchase the $349 AppleCare Protection Plan, which extends phone support and repair coverage to three years. By way of contrast, you can upgrade most PCs' warranties to three years of support for around $200. Apple does offer online troubleshooting, and its Web forums are a good resource to get tips from other users and download the product's printed manual.
iTunes MP3 conversion(Shorter bars indicate faster performance)
Photoshop CS (Shorter bars indicate faster performance)
|
Photoshop CS (in minutes) | |
Unreal Tournament 2004(Longer bars indicate better performance)
|
Unreal Tournament 2004 (In frames per second) | |
DVD movie battery-drain test(Longer bars indicate longer battery life)
|
DVD movie battery-drain test (In hours) | |
Updated April 12, 2006: The following charts represent our findings in pitting a 2.0GHz MacBook Pro (running Windows XP via Boot Camp) against the original MacBook Pro (running OS X Tiger) we tested, as well as against a few non-Apple systems.
In our Photoshop test, the original MacBook Pro struggled, forced to process the application through its Rosetta translation program, which resulted in performance that was about five times slower than the PC competition--slower than on even the
lowest-end iBook. Because a native version of Photoshop for OS X isn't expected until sometime next year, the ability to run Photoshop smoothly on a MacBook Pro running Windows XP is a crucial step forward.
Photoshop CSIn minutes (Shorter bars indicate faster performance)
MacBook Pro (Windows XP Pro)
2.5
In our iTunes conversion test, the original MacBook came at the top of the heap, slightly ahead of the HP, the Acer, and the MacBook Pro running Windows XP. We'll chalk this up to the fact that Apple's applications will always run best on Apple hardware. Still, the difference is nominal.
iTunes multiple MP3 conversion testIn minutes (Shorter bars indicate faster performance)
MacBook Pro (Windows XP Pro)
2.05
Perhaps the best news is that Boot Camp shows the potential for gaming on a Mac. Where the MacBook Pro running OS X Tiger turned in only 13.8 frames per second (fps) in our standard Doom 3 benchmark, the MacBook Pro running Windows XP notched 21.6fps. Yes, this is likely partially due to the difference in the processor speed, but more so due to the fact that Doom 3 was built to run on Windows XP. There's no question: You'll have a noticeably better gaming experience on a Mac running Windows XP than Mac OS X.
Doom 3In frames per second (Longer bars indicate faster performance)
MacBook Pro (Windows XP Pro)
21.6
The remainder of our tests, Sorenson Squeeze, Dr. Divx, and Cinebench, all test encoding performance. The charts speak volumes. The MacBook Pro running Windows XP delivers performance power that's identical to the PC competition.
Sorenson Squeeze video encodingIn minutes (Shorter bars indicate faster performance)
MacBook Pro (Windows XP Pro)
4.41
Dr. Divx file conversionIn minutes (Shorter bars indicate faster performance)
MacBook Pro (Windows XP Pro)
2.55
CinebenchIn seconds (Shorter bars indicate faster performance)
MacBook Pro (Windows XP Pro)
48.7
We'll be running some more benchmarks, including MobileMark and SysMark, during the next few days. But talk back to me now: What do these results mean to you? Are you ready to buy a MacBook Pro?
System configurations:
Acer TravelMate 8200
Windows XP Professional; 2GHz Intel Core Duo T2500; 2GB PC 4300 DDR2 SDRAM 533MHz; ATI Mobility Radeon x1600 512MB (256MB shared); Seagate Momentus 5400.2 120GB 5,400rpm
Apple iBook G4 (1.33GHz, 12-inch)
OS X 10.4.2; PowerPC G4 1.33GHz; 512MB PC2700 333MHz DDR SDRAM; ATI Mobility Radeon 9550 32MB; Fujitsu MHV2040AT 40GB 4,200rpm
Apple iBook G4 (1.33GHz, 14-inch)
OS X 10.3.8; PowerPC G4 1.33GHz; 256MB PC2100 266MHz DDR SDRAM; ATI Mobility Radeon 9200 32MB; Fujitsu MHT2060AT 60GB 4,200rpm
Apple MacBook Pro (1.83GHz Core Duo, 15.4-inch)
OS X 10.4.5; Core Duo 1.83GHz; 512MB PC4200 333MHz DDR2 SDRAM; ATI Mobility Radeon x1600 128MB; Fujitsu MHT2060AT 60GB 4,200rpm
Apple MacBook Pro (2.0GHz Core Duo, 15.4-inch)
OS X 10.4.5 and Windows XP Professional; Core Duo 2.0GHz; 2GB 666MHz DDR2 SDRAM; ATI Mobility Radeon x1600 128MB; Fujitsu 120GB 5,400rpm
Apple PowerBook G4 (1.5GHz, 12-inch)
OS X 10.4.2; PowerPC G4 1.5GHz; 512MB PC2700 333MHz DDR SDRAM; Nvidia GeForce FX 5200 64MB; Hitachi Travelstar 5K100 80GB 5,400rpm
Apple PowerBook G4 (1.67GHz, 15-inch)
OS X 10.4.1; PowerPC G4 1.67GHz; 512MB PC2700 333MHz DDR SDRAM; ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 64MB; Fujitsu MHT2080AH 80GB 5,400rpm
Apple PowerBook G4 (1.67GHz, 17-inch)
OS X 10.4.2; PowerPC G4 1.67GHz; 512MB PC4200 333MHz DDR2 SDRAM; ATI Mobility Radeon 9700 128MB; Seagate Momentus 5400.2 120GB 5,400rpm
HP Pavilion dv1000t
Windows XP Professional; 2GHz Intel Core Duo T2500; 1GB PC4300 DDR2 SDRAM 533MHz; Intel 945GM 128MB; Seagate Momentus 5400.2 120GB 5,400rpm