The boxy Brother HL-6050D weighs nearly 46 pounds and stands just more than a foot tall by 15.4 inches wide and 16.7 inches deep. Its putty-colored plastic with navy blue logo trim is about as bland as printer design gets. The curved top output tray holds a roomy 250 sheets facedown, or 50 sheets faceup, however--convenient when you do a lot of printing. A 15-line LCD glows, traffic-light style: green for go, orange to show it's busy, or bright red for a problem. A target-style menu controller includes a data light to indicate print job status, as well as buttons to reprint the last document, cancel a job, or change menu choices and pause the printer.
The HL-6050D's cover pops open easily so that you can change the toner cartridge and print drum. Happily, there's a full-size toner cartridge rated to last 7,500 text pages. Replacement cartridges cost about $100, giving you a nice, low cost per page of about 1.3 cents--nearly a penny below average.
This printer's generous 500-sheet main paper tray holds letter or legal-size papers, and a business on the make can add an additional 500-sheet tray for $250. Just inside the front cover, the 100-sheet multipurpose tray accepts handfed heavy, fragile, or specialty papers, and you can open a straight paper path in the back of the printer.
The HL-6050D is powered by a 200MHz processor, and you can expand the 32MB of memory up to 160MB to better handle a heavy network work flow.
The Brother HL-6050D turned in a lickety-split performance on CNET Labs' laser speed tests. It produced more than 18 pages per minute (ppm) of text and almost 17.5ppm on graphics, beating out many printers in its class and price range.
The HL-6050D's normal, 600dpi text-output quality looked good, but just barely. The letters in CNET Labs' text document were clear and readable but appeared dark gray rather than solid black. The graphics output, tested at default settings, was fair; our test document came out looking like a bad photocopy job. Areas of fine detail were mottled with clearly visible dots, and arbitrary vertical lines appeared within gradients and in dark areas. Line art looked fine, but even when we bumped up the resolution to 1,200dpi and printed again, the gradients were still unsatisfactory.