SanDisk Sansa e250 series

SanDisk Sansa e250 (2GB) Reviewed on 03/10/2006

The Bottom Line: The SanDisk Sansa e200 series offers a boatload of features for a reasonable price, in a package that is much nicer than that of past SanDisk models. For those looking for a high-capacity, compact, skip-free MP3/WMA player, start with the e200 series.

Release Date: 01/06/2006

Specs: 1.7 in x 3.5 in x 0.5 in, 2.6 oz

CNET editors' take

SanDisk Sansa e260 (4GB) Reviewed on 03/10/2006

The Bottom Line: The SanDisk Sansa e200 series offers a boatload of features for a reasonable price, in a package that is much nicer than that of past SanDisk models. For those looking for a high-capacity, compact, skip-free MP3/WMA player, start with the e200 series.

Release Date: 01/06/2006

Specs: 1.7 in x 3.5 in x 0.5 in, 2.6 oz

CNET editors' take

SanDisk Sansa e270 (6GB) Reviewed on 03/10/2006

The Bottom Line: The SanDisk Sansa e200 series offers a boatload of features for a reasonable price, in a package that is much nicer than that of past SanDisk models. For those looking for a high-capacity, compact, skip-free MP3/WMA player, start with the e200 series.

Release Date: 01/06/2006

Specs: 1.7 in x 3.5 in x 0.5 in, 2.6 oz

CNET editors' take

SanDisk Sansa e280 (8GB) Reviewed on 03/10/2006

The Bottom Line: The SanDisk Sansa e200 series offers a boatload of features for a reasonable price, in a package that is much nicer than that of past SanDisk models. For those looking for a high-capacity, compact, skip-free MP3/WMA player, start with the e200 series.

Release Date: 01/06/2006

Specs: 1.7 in x 3.5 in x 0.5 in, 2.6 oz

CNET editors' take

SanDisk Sansa e280 w/ Base Station (8GB) Reviewed on 03/10/2006

The Bottom Line: The SanDisk Sansa e200 series offers a boatload of features for a reasonable price, in a package that is much nicer than that of past SanDisk models. For those looking for a high-capacity, compact, skip-free MP3/WMA player, start with the e200 series.

Release Date: 01/06/2006

Specs: 1.7 in x 3.5 in x 0.5 in, 2.6 oz

CNET editors' take