-
"Looks like the Shuffle?!?!?"
4.0 starson by fleuryaPros: Innovative design
Cons: small controls
Summary: I just had to reply to a comment that they are stealling design from Apple. This is really unbelievavle and stupid! Put this thing next to a Shuffle and ask people if they look alike. they'll think your nuts! Why is it the same, because it's small? So Apple has exclusive rights to making things small??? You Apple guys are really getting out of control. YOUR STUFF IS NOT THAT GREAT ANYMORE! DEAL WITH IT!!
- 5 replies to this review
-
I laugh in (and at) the faces of the Apple guys that think this even remotely resembles a Shuffle. Harhar!<br><br>Also, I am amazed and in awe of the other comments, which state that YOU are saying this player looks like the shuffle. (How the hell?) Like I instruct to many people, make sure you understand what you're replying to, "neh?"
-
looks nothing like it. shuffle's flat.<br>this is round. shuffle is wide, this is thin. shuffle has big button, this has little toggles. shuffle is WHITE. this is BLACK. etc etc
-
I don't see how this is simliar, and I've yet to know how it's similiar to the apple's nano. <br><br>Like I said to the other user, why don't you just say this for all miniscule sized mp3s, neh?
-
I'm trying to figure out what your point is, but I can't tell what side you're one. Your grammar, punctuation, capitalization, etc. is so horrible that you don't make sense. <br>Are you complaining that it looks like the Shuffle? Who cares? Look at how many MP3 players look like Ipods. That's just how it is. All DVD players look alike. All VCRs look alike. All TVs look alike. Things look alike! <br>Ugh...<br>Quit writing if you don't know how to use a keyboard.
-
I agree, and dont need to post anything more than I agree.