CNET editors' take
- Reviewed on: 04/27/2006
In our tests, we found that the Google Scholar beta sifts through more publications than does the Windows Live Academic Search beta (though Microsoft plans to add more sources). Google found 44,000 results when we looked up thalidomide--8,410 of those within the past few years--far more than Windows Live Academic Search's total of 1,595 finds. If you're just researching physics and astronomy, for instance, and need to weed out articles on computer science, you can narrow your searches at Google's Advanced Scholar page. There, you can also have Google look through specific journals or look for specific authors and date ranges; Windows Live offers no similar tool.
Use the Preferences page to make Google Scholar work best for you, such as searching only your university's library. Tell Google to hunt within the stacks at Northwestern University, for example, and a Find It @NU Library link appears next to articles in stock at that institution. Google can add a Library link for up to three institutions at a time. You can also choose to find reports in Chinese, Spanish, German, and Portuguese in addition to English. Google's Cited By link lets you jump to other referring articles; however, unlike with Windows Live Academic Search, there's no author link to let you immediately find, say, publications by one of your professors.
The Google Scholar beta also lets you display citation links to import into BibTex, EndNote, RefMan, or RefWorks. Windows Live Academic Search displays only BibTex or EndNote formats. Plus, Google provides a quick way to add its Scholar search bar to your own Web site.
Continue readingMost helpful user reviews
-
Average user rating:
0 stars
Not yet available
Back to product review - My rating: 0 stars Write review
-
Showing 1 of 1 user review
- See 1 user review Write review
