Pros The Pros are that it is still a Call Of Duty game and that it has online play.
Cons Cons are the graphics are by no means up to par with the previous Call of duty. Also, the sound is a bit uncoordinated. Finally, the movement of the characters feel and look a bit too robotic.
Summary Rent this game first before you by it. I bought it and I feel that I wasted my money on a game that if anything it should have been better then the one before, but it ended up been worst.
Pros see summary
Cons see summary
Summary Pros: Enyone feeling like blowing apart piece's of zombies? well what about Nazi zombies? With really fun and intense gameplay, nazi zombies really makes you come back for more zombie madness! You can get weapons like M2 Flamethrower's, Ray Guns (alien gun's from the 50's), and some really cool machine guns, shot-guns, and rifles! with tons of really cool and awsome weapons you'll always have fun dismembering zombies! :D
Online play is back, and who would have thought that killing poeple with guns from like 64 years ago would have been this fun! WW2 has never been this fun, and i really mean that! getting to roast people online with a M2 Flamethrower is actually preety cool to see. Online is NOT a let down, and if you think it is, well then your sadly mistaking!
Ok so the big question here is the campaigne and the weapons! their lots of weapons on COD5 (well atleast the cool ones :P) here's a list to show whatkind of family the guns come from and all the guns that you can use on Call of Duty: World at War
Arisaka Type 99
Heavy Sub-Machine guns
Browning Automatic Rifle
Light Sub-Machine guns
Type 100 Sub-Machine gun
Light Machine guns
Type 92 Heavy Machine gun
M1903 Springfield Scoped
Mosin Nagant Scoped
Knife(not used as sidearm slot)
Katana(not sure if its used as a sidearm slot)
... These are all the weapons and the M1A1 Carbine is a special gun, but dont worry you can unlock that weapons we you rank online!
WW2 has NEVER looked this beautiful! Every pixel is at work on this game and the sound is just amazing! it's so real and so vivid, sometimes you might even forget your playing a game!
The controls respond REALLY quick and are perfect and preety much easy to remeber! Yay.
...Time for the negative of this game
Their should be more levels for the Nazi Zombie's! (for PS3 and X360)
It would of been cool if Hitler was the boss of the Nazi zombies, but sadly we don't get to blow off his head.
The game could of been a bit longer, but hey im not rellay complaining. You might just findyourself trying to beat it fast enyway because you might just want to unlock the Nazi Zombies. (in order to unlock Nazi Zombies, you need to beat story mode on eny diffaculty level.)
overall, this game really deserves a good score, so im hear to give it just that!
I give Call of Duty: World at War for Playstation 3 ... 9.6/ 10
Pros Co-op in single player missions.
Online display is a tad better and more graphical then cod4
Much more realistic than cod4.
vast, detailed maps
more leading tactics
Cons The guns arent the greatest
graphics are not beter, maybe even worse than cod4.
Dissapointed how its back to the "based on wII"
Summary I have both cod5 and cod4. Cod4 is maybe a bit better. However, if you played cod4 for a long time now it has gotten very boring. And cod5 just a great game to play to continue the cod experience. But, Cod5 is much more realistic then Cod4. The big problme is that it goes back to world war two. The game play is a bit better than cod4, especially online. But the I kinda miss the modern warfare. The vast maps have many buildings, broken planes, and other blownup and damaged materials to run around and hide in. The snipping isnt that great in cod5, but still its cool. There are many more reason i can expand on and such, but i prefer not to. I definetly recomend cod5. Although, the price is a bit expensive. $60.00(CDN).
Pros All the good of COD4 with extra tweaking, more realism and even gore thrown in. If you're a fan of WWII then this is the best in the genre. CO-OP Campaign is AWESOME! IMO, better than COD4 in all areas.
Cons Some of the levels in the pacific are too detailed and colorful from the flowers and foliage, which makes it a little tiring on the eyes in multiplayer. That's about it!
Summary If you're a fan of WWII then this is the best in the genre. IMO, better than COD4 in all areas. More customization and ways to play the game.
"Waste of money"on by matthewdds
Pros The maps are larger but there are only 8 maps...***...
Cons 1) The maps are either way to small or way to large. These maps aren't fun to play on compared to COD4... 2) There are only 8 maps, 3) This game is much darker and the old WWII weapons suck to use
Summary Don't buy this game, instead buy COD4... The online playing for COD4 is much more fun than World at War. The weapons on COD4 are soo much better to use and the maps are 10 X better!!! I honestly think I wasted my money buying this stupid game.
Why can't the makers of these games make a COD with a lot of maps? The only reason I like these games is because of the online play! World at War online play sucks!!!