Version: 2008
  • On BNET: Make cool hacks for Google Maps
advertisement

AMD Phenom X4 9850 (2.5GHz)

Add to my list Product summary

The good: Unlocked multiplier allows overclocking; required motherboard offers minor gaming benefit; slightly faster MP3 encoding than Intel.

The bad: Poor overall bang for the buck at this price; faster competing chip from Intel is also overclockable.

The bottom line: AMD's new Phenom X4 9850 is overpriced and outclassed compared with its Intel-based quad-core competition. If PC vendors can use this chip to make cheap systems (as they did with older Phenoms), we might have nicer things to say, but as a DIY part at this price, we can't recommend AMD's latest quad-core CPU.

Read full review

Compare this processor to:

CNET editors' review

  • Reviewed on: 03/26/2008
  • Released on: 03/27/2008

From a do-it-yourself perspective, we're mostly unimpressed with AMD's new 2.5GHz Phenom X4 9850 quad-core desktop processor. This $235 CPU comes in only $10 less than Intel's comparable quad-core chip, but with noticeably slower performance on almost every one of our tests. Even the new Phenom's unlocked multiplier, which enables overclocking, can't save it, because you can do the same thing with Intel's faster chip. As we said with the initial round of Phenom chips, if the price drops (or if system vendors are able to offer them cheaply), it might look better, but with this performance and at this price, AMD still can't wrest the quad-cord lead from Intel.

The Phenom X4 9850 is part of the batch of higher-end Phenoms that were beset by a "TLB erratum" that delayed their launch and partly explains why we've so far seen only the 2.2GHz Phenom 9500 and the 2.3GHz Phenom 9600. According to AMD, it has fixed the issue in the higher-end chips, which affected data prioritization, and that the X4 9850 is ready to go. In the spirit of a fresh start, AMD has also rereleased the older Phenoms, dubbing them the Phenom X4 9550 and the X4 9650, although neither original model was affected by the TLB bug, and the performance of the new versions is exactly the same as the originals.

The X4 9850, though, features some more technical improvements over the lower-end models, and not just a faster core clock speed. Like the Phenom 9500 and 9600--and past AMD chip designs as well--the X4 9850 has a built-in memory controller regulating the speed at which data moves between the processor and the system memory. It also relies on the HyperTransport 3.0 standard, which links the processor to the various other components in your system, such as the PCI-Express data path for graphics processing. The memory controller and the HyperTransport clock in the earlier Phenom chips came in at 1.8GHz and 3.6GHz, respectively. The Phenom X4 9850 received boosts to 2.0GHz on the memory controller and on HyperTransport to 4.0GHz.

Despite all of that technical tweaking, the X4 9850 still fares poorly on our performance tests compared with Intel's old Core 2 Quad Q6600, which currently sells for almost the exact same price as the X4 9850.

Multimedia multitasking test (in seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
AMD Phenom X4 9850
631 

Apple iTunes encoding test (in seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
AMD Phenom X4 9850
161 

Adobe Photoshop CS3 image-processing test (in seconds)
(Shorter bars indicate better performance)
AMD Phenom X4 9850
178 

Continue reading

Most helpful user reviews

Submit your review

Log in or create an account to submit your review for:

AMD Phenom X4 9850 (2.5GHz)

ORLog in with your Facebook account
1. Rate this product:
(Mouse over the stars to rate this product and click to set your rating.)
2. One-line summary:(Summarize your review in one line. 10 characters minimum; required.)
0 of 55 characters
3. Pros:(Tell us what you like about this product. 10 characters minimum; required.)
0 of 250 characters
4. Cons:(Tell us what you don't like about this product. 10 characters minimum; required.)
0 of 250 characters
Bottom-line summary:(Explain to us in detail why you like or dislike the product, focusing your comments on the product's features and functionality, and your experience using the product. This field is optional.)
0 of 5000 characters

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks are prohibited.
Click here to review our site terms of use.

Submit

Where to buy

AMD Phenom X4 9850 (2.5GHz): $154.99 - $198.95
storepricein stock?rating
Amazon.com Marketplace
$198.95 Yes 5.0 star rating
TigerDirect.com
$154.99 Yes 5.0 star rating
Circuit City
$154.99 Yes 5.0 star rating

see prices from 3 stores

advertisement

Recent user reviews

Submit your review

Log in or create an account to submit your review for:

AMD Phenom X4 9850 (2.5GHz)

ORLog in with your Facebook account
1. Rate this product:
(Mouse over the stars to rate this product and click to set your rating.)
2. One-line summary:(Summarize your review in one line. 10 characters minimum; required.)
0 of 55 characters
3. Pros:(Tell us what you like about this product. 10 characters minimum; required.)
0 of 250 characters
4. Cons:(Tell us what you don't like about this product. 10 characters minimum; required.)
0 of 250 characters
Bottom-line summary:(Explain to us in detail why you like or dislike the product, focusing your comments on the product's features and functionality, and your experience using the product. This field is optional.)
0 of 5000 characters

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks are prohibited.
Click here to review our site terms of use.

Submit

Reviews from around the WebPowered by alaTest

  • alaTest.com

    Summary: alaTest collected and analyzed 2612 reviews of AMD Phenom 9600 / 2.3 GHz processor from international magazines and websites and compared these to 48380 reviews for other Processors & Motherboards. Experts rate this product 70/100 and users 94/100. The amount of rated reviews for this product is too low to calculate a reliable alaScore™.

    Read full review

  • pcformat.co.uk

    Editors' rating: 60

    Summary: An interesting sideshow for the multicore main event, but Intel still holds the centre stage

    Read full review

  • techradar.com

    Editors' rating: 70

    Summary: In professional applications - for audio, video, photo and 3D editing, for example - multi- threading is already the norm and as we found in our Kenstfield reviews, performance in optimised applications scales very nicely as you add more ...

    Read full review

  • newbie.org

    Editors' rating: 100

    Read full review

  • itp.net

    Editors' rating: 80

    Summary: While the FX-60 is fast, it will only reach its full potential when more multithreaded software becomes available.

    Read full review

  • modsynergy.com

    Summary: The AMD Athlon 64 3000+ is one fast processor. Throughout testing, everything was stable and very smooth. Compared to my old Athlon XP processor, the AMD Athlon 64 3000+ provided smooth games than before (before was jerky), applications opened faster ...

    Read full review

AMD Phenom X4 9850 (2.5GHz)