Version: 2008
advertisement

Panasonic TH-50PH9UK

Full user review

  • 20 out of 51 people found this review helpful

    1.5 stars

    "Burn-in CAVEAT!!!!!"

    by vanstoons on August 26, 2006

    Pros: Great picture

    Cons: Burn in danger, normal mode frowned up on!!!!!

    Summary: I happily uncrated my new TV and hooked it up...then cracked the manual to find out that viewing in "normal" mode (which is almost ALL television is broadcast) is not suggested because of burn in on the side bars!!! The options are the hideous stretch and zoom modes that make you dizzy or turn people into fat blobs.
    The only solution is to use the GREY side bars, which just look stupid. Using the black bars cause irreversible burn-in!!!! This completely ruined my buying experience.
    Why hasn't this been mentioned more? I had thought this anomaly was conquered in the newer plasmas, but I guess not. EXTREMELY disappointed, am investigating returning this product for an LCD.

    Was this review helpful? YES | NO

    Reply to this review

  • 16 replies to this review
  • reply by: brignolo on August 6, 2007

    You need to take some time to read the manual all the way through. You have an excellent piece of equipment.

  • reply by: gviola1 on March 8, 2007

    He should be thanking Panasonic for dealing with the issue in a forthright manner with advice and workarounds. Its a technology issue, not Panasonics.

    AND, if vanstoons had actually RTFM, he/she would have found the JUSTIFY aspect setting, which pretty much fixes the other 'problem' mentioned.

    SHEESH!

  • reply by: duckhuntinpro on December 21, 2006

    I think vanstoon has not done enough research. before i buy any tv of the sort i do a ton of research. all tv's are prone to burn in, plasmas the most, as the gas filled cells are more prone to "remembering" permanently what color they display if that color is displayed for an extended period of time. burn in can be avoided by doing a few simple things, changing the aspect ratio, adjusting the color temperatures, and especially using low brightness etc for the first 100 or so hours of using the tv. with proper care these things rock. i personally think they kick the crap out of lcd's. Unless your a huge gamer plasma is the way to go. i think the colors are richer and it does way better with movies, but thats just my opinion. another thing to look at when researching is the fact that panasonic is a first tier plasma developer. this new 9th generation screen is top of the line. it has the best features, both quality and to prevent burn in. if for some reason you do happen to watch something for too long, such as the fox news channel which is horrible for plasmas you can white wash the screen. some plasmas even have an anti burn in program to run, although this one doesnt. i think it comes down to research and good judgement. if your spending that much money, spend a solid week or so reading all types of reviews and ratings, look at worthy sites and form a conclusion. Overall, i believe vanstoons opinion is highly inaccurate and should be diregarded.

  • reply by: Pannylover4ever on November 1, 2006

    Wouldn't it be smarter to ***** about burn in after noticing ACTUAL burn in? The burn in clause is left more as a precaution in case you leave a static image for days on end.

    The unit has the same resistance as a CRT for burn in. I use Just or Full for the limited 4:3 programming I watch and don?t see what the big deal is.

    Besides, anyone that thinks LCD?s are immune to this should visit a electronics store, LCD?s that have been on with 4:3 programming for a long time show afterimage bars on each side. I saw this first hand a couple of weeks back at CompUSA which had a 32? LCD screen with image burn in.

    If all you are watching is 4:3, then why get a 16:9 anyways? Just keep your CRT and go to the movies.

  • reply by: Pannylover4ever on November 1, 2006

    Wouldn't it be smarter to ***** about burn in after noticing ACTUAL burn in?

    The burn in clause is left more as a precaution in case you leave a static image for days on end.

    The unit has the same resistance as a CRT for burn in. I use Just or Full for the limited 4:3 programming I watch and don?t see what the big deal is. Besides, anyone that thinks LCD?s are immune to this should visit an electronics store. LCD?s that have been on with 4:3 programming for a long time show afterimage bars on each side. I saw this first hand a couple of weeks back at CompUSA which had a 32? LCD screen with image burn in.

    If all you are watching is 4:3, then why get a 16:9 anyways? Just keep your CRT and be happy.

  • reply by: digital_101 on October 25, 2006

    I few years back my friends big screen had the option of the middle 80% or so being normal and the left and right sides (remaining 20%) being gently stretched to fit the screen. The results were amazing when viewing normal television, the 10% on each end of the normal viewing screen are hardly valuable real-estate - i found it to be the best solution - bypassing rediculous Grey or Black bars on a television costing more then $3000, where did this great technology go? Without a doubt it was 350% better then side bars. I think the industry is hoping that normal 4:3 viewing will disappear magically, we all know it won't. I'm looking at the $7000 Pioneer Elite, guess what - Grey bars when viewing 4:3 material, what crap.

    Sean
    San Francisco

  • reply by: tae_kwon_doh! on October 12, 2006

    Original post seems to ignore the basic realities of plasma technology. Plasma burn-in does not occur as easily as it used to, especially if you avoid static images in the first 100 of the display's life. Also, the aspect ratio issue with this display is easily resolved using the zoom and stretch modes of most set-top boxes.

  • reply by: jlmckinn on October 10, 2006

    vanstoon shouldn't waste his money on a plasma........maybe a black and white tv would be more suitable

  • reply by: jlmckinn on October 10, 2006

    vanstoon shouldn't waste his money on a plasma........maybe a black and white tv would be more suitable

  • reply by: Saltiva on October 10, 2006

    Maybe you got a different model because I haven't had this problem

  • reply by: joetoronto on October 10, 2006

    I think the original poster realized he couldn't afford this monitor and is making excuses for going with LCD.

    lol, laughable.

  • reply by: jeffo80 on September 12, 2006

    Ever play an old 80's videogame at a pizza place? Find one old enough and it's likely that the title screen or other static graphics have burned into the image.

    My current set, an internal projection widescreen warns about burn ins and offers the same "grey" bar siding by default. Yeah, it's not as cool and crisp as the black, but its a safety precaution taken on all widescreens to prevent the black from burning in, offer a more neutral color.

    Plasma's and projection TVs are just more easily burnt than the old tube TVs, which is why precautions like this must be taken.

    Don't give a poor review because you didn't do your homework.

  • reply by: Peachboy on September 6, 2006

    I have the 42" version of this set. I knew exactly what I was getting when I purchased it. Best practices for plasma owners include a 100 hour (at least) break-in period where you don't allow bars (side or top/bottom) or static images. Also, keep the picture settings very low.

    If you do this for over 100 hours, your risk of burn in drops dramatically.

    Don't buy any plasma if you don't like stretched standard definition content.

  • reply by: TeoNYC on September 6, 2006

    I have to agree with the previous comment. All plasmas have risk of burn in, and Panasonic has addressed that problem the best of any manufacturer. I believe they are rated to be as long lasting as a tube TV, although I'm not sure I'd put that to the test. To poorly rate this unit because the buyer didn't do their research on Plasmas in general, is unfair to others reading user reviews. I have an older generation Panasonic Plasma and after 4 years, there's no burn in.

    Here are some suggestions to maximize your enjoyment of your screen while minimizing the risk of any ghosting or burn in. First, try using the JUST setting, which stretches the image at the edges, leaving the center part of the screen normal. It can take a few days for you to adjust to it, but I found it is the best. If you do use black bars, then run the roll-bar screen saver for a few minutes at the end of your viewing. It will help minimize any residual image. Finally, adjust the "picture" or brightness setting to something less over-the-top dynamic. The factory settings are way to saturated and give an unnatural color. The "cinema" setting is a good place to start, then try dialing up the brightness until you're happy. By reducing the brightness just by a small amount, you'll reduce risk of burn in dramatically.

  • reply by: NestoJR on September 1, 2006

    if the "stupidness" of gray bars bugs you so much, stretch the image. problem solved. you can't change the way technology works and i doubt under normal viewing using black bars would do much damage. but don't give this great tv a low score because you're ignorant and hate gray. Does the tv really deserve a score of 3 ???? Give me a break.

  • reply by: jab106 on August 27, 2006

    100% of Plasma TVs run the risk of burn-in from a sustained image on the screen. Panasonic probably has the best resistance of all makes on the market today.

    If you plan to do most of your viewing of standard-definition TV, you should stick with a standard set or live with one of the stretch modes that are available from pretty much all vendors.

    You've got a great set--now sign up for that HD cable service, get yourself an HD-DVD player and enjoy!

Write review Back to product review See all 25 reviews

Where to buy

Panasonic TH-50PH9UK: $1,949.00
storepricein stock?rating
Amazon.com Marketplace
$1,949.00 Yes 5.0 star rating

see prices from 1 store

Submit your review

Log in or create an account to submit your review for:

Panasonic TH-50PH9UK

ORLog in with your Facebook account
1. Rate this product:
(Mouse over the stars to rate this product and click to set your rating.)
2. One-line summary:(Summarize your review in one line. 10 characters minimum; required.)
0 of 55 characters
3. Pros:(Tell us what you like about this product. 10 characters minimum; required.)
0 of 250 characters
4. Cons:(Tell us what you don't like about this product. 10 characters minimum; required.)
0 of 250 characters
Bottom-line summary:(Explain to us in detail why you like or dislike the product, focusing your comments on the product's features and functionality, and your experience using the product. This field is optional.)
0 of 5000 characters

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks are prohibited.
Click here to review our site terms of use.

Submit

Compare prices for Panasonic TH-50PH9UK

Price: $1,949.00
Amazon.com Marketplace $1,949.00
advertisement
Click Here
advertisement