X

Up close with AT&T's 4G LTE speeds in San Francisco

It's been several days since AT&T's 4G network has been spotted in cities where the faster network hasn't even been officially launched.

Jessica Dolcourt Senior Director, Commerce & Content Operations
Jessica Dolcourt is a passionate content strategist and veteran leader of CNET coverage. As Senior Director of Commerce & Content Operations, she leads a number of teams, including Commerce, How-To and Performance Optimization. Her CNET career began in 2006, testing desktop and mobile software for Download.com and CNET, including the first iPhone and Android apps and operating systems. She continued to review, report on and write a wide range of commentary and analysis on all things phones, with an emphasis on iPhone and Samsung. Jessica was one of the first people in the world to test, review and report on foldable phones and 5G wireless speeds. Jessica began leading CNET's How-To section for tips and FAQs in 2019, guiding coverage of topics ranging from personal finance to phones and home. She holds an MA with Distinction from the University of Warwick (UK).
Expertise Content strategy | Team leadership | Audience engagement | Tips and FAQs | iPhone | Samsung | Android | iOS
Jessica Dolcourt
2 min read
LG Nitro HD, left, HTC Vivid, right
Diagnostic speed scores in San Francisco, the LG Nitro HD, left, and HTC Vivid, right. Screenshots by Jessica Dolcourt/CNET

The AT&T 4G LTE speeds guessing game is unofficially over. Late last week we began hearing reports of the LTE icon popping up in the notification bars of AT&T's three compatible smartphones--the Samsung Galaxy S II Skyrocket, HTC Vivid, and LG Nitro HD.

So, I fired up Ookla's Speedtest.net app to test diagnostics (for ping, download, and upload speeds) on two compatible phones we have in-house, the Nitro HD and the Vivid.

What speed sampling would be complete without caveats? Since the LTE network is a soft-launch and nothing official or necessarily widespread, since the app scores are not the final word in real-world performance, and since this is not intended to be a scrutinized comparison between AT&T and any other network, consider the Speedtest.net results a diagnostic suggestion, with more in-depth testing to come after AT&T cuts the red ribbon on LTE.

With that said, the speeds look promising at their fastest, mostly sticking to the 14 or 15Mbps range for downloads, with spikes into the 30Mbps range and a rock-bottom outlier of just 0.75Mbps.

The Vivid, on the other hand, was less consistent in these preliminary speed trials. It hit highs in the 17-to-19Mbps download range, but also hit road blocks, completing downloads at a rate of 0-to-2Mbps, which is extremely slow.

Still, with both phones' initial results taken together, signs point to LTE as a significantly faster 4G service in San Francisco--at least in areas where signal is unobstructed and strong. AT&T's ability to sustain LTE speeds is yet to be seen in these new markets, especially as AT&T continues building out its network.

Of course, we're still waiting for AT&T to officially flip the switch and fully support LTE in uncovered regions, like the San Francisco Bay Area, Los Angeles, and New York (which should officially get it by the year's end).

Until then, if you're lucky enough to get a taste of a twice-as-fast network, consider yourself among the lucky.

And if you're not, hold on a little longer. LTE is on the way.