- Average user rating: 3.0 stars out of 6 reviews Back to product review
- My rating: 0 stars Write review
User reviews
-
7 out of 7 people found this review helpful
3.5 stars
"Good, but Polar S625X is better"
Pros: Quality Construction and excellent custom workout creation software
Cons: Poor HR strap, no bike functions and limited customization
Summary: This review is based on using the Nike Triax ... read more
-
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful
2.0 stars
"Great potential, Poor software and seals"
Pros: Works with Mac OSX, tracks data
Cons: needs electrode jelly to work, hates rain
Summary: Having owned a basic Polar for 3 years and wa... read more
-
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful
4.5 stars
Pros: Software is excelent, accurate pedometer
Cons: expensive ==-
Summary: I've had the hrm for about 3months and have b... read more
-
3.0 stars
"Heart rate OR running time BUT not both while running."
Pros: It is one of the few with Mac OS compatible logging software, is very durable in +100 degree heat or 20 degree cold, accurate and reliable
Cons: After 3 years use band cracked, Nike will not replace band for less than $100; cannot monitor your heart rate and your run time simultaneously during your run. If fact, you have to stop/save your run before you can check your alternate statistics.
Summary: Pros and Cons sum it up other than also lacki... read more
-
1.5 stars
Pros: Extensive data collection.
Cons: No software updates, no support
Summary: This watch when it works performs well but if... read more
